aurora-reviews mailing list archives: December 2014

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block.
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 19:30
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 19:40
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 19:42
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 20:25
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:24
Joshua Cohen     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:34
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:37
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:35
Joshua Cohen     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:40
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:44
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:50
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 23:01
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 23:18
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Mon, 01 Dec, 23:26
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Tue, 02 Dec, 02:12
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Tue, 02 Dec, 02:14
Brian Wickman         Re: Review Request 28486: Move sandbox initialization into try block. Tue, 02 Dec, 22:09
Re: Review Request 28345: Move thermos_runner out of the apache.aurora.executor package.
Brian Wickman   Re: Review Request 28345: Move thermos_runner out of the apache.aurora.executor package. Mon, 01 Dec, 19:46
Bill Farner Review Request 28571: Reject jobs containing an empty cron schedule. Mon, 01 Dec, 20:07
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28571: Reject jobs containing an empty cron schedule. Mon, 01 Dec, 20:24
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28571: Reject jobs containing an empty cron schedule. Tue, 02 Dec, 02:20
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28571: Reject jobs containing an empty cron schedule. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:28
Re: Review Request 28449: Fix some URLs and text in release emails to include "-incubating" where appropriate.
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28449: Fix some URLs and text in release emails to include "-incubating" where appropriate. Mon, 01 Dec, 20:08
Jake Farrell   Re: Review Request 28449: Fix some URLs and text in release emails to include "-incubating" where appropriate. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:01
Bill Farner Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Mon, 01 Dec, 20:32
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Mon, 01 Dec, 20:46
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Mon, 01 Dec, 22:27
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 02:35
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:03
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:04
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:14
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:30
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:43
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:49
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28572: Minimize the state consumed when collecting preemption victims. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:49
Kevin Sweeney Review Request 28605: Don't intercept methods on thrift that don't return Response. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:20
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28605: Don't intercept methods on thrift that don't return Response. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:24
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28605: Don't intercept methods on thrift that don't return Response. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:24
David McLaughlin   Re: Review Request 28605: Don't intercept methods on thrift that don't return Response. Tue, 02 Dec, 19:32
Bill Farner Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Tue, 02 Dec, 22:03
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Tue, 02 Dec, 22:20
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Tue, 02 Dec, 23:09
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:19
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:27
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:39
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:39
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:47
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 02:05
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 02:06
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 18:20
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 18:23
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28607: Add a caching ClusterState implementation. Wed, 03 Dec, 18:36
Kevin Sweeney Review Request 28610: Use requirements.txt for 3rdparty/python. Tue, 02 Dec, 22:32
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28610: Use requirements.txt for 3rdparty/python. Tue, 02 Dec, 22:44
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28610: Use requirements.txt for 3rdparty/python. Tue, 02 Dec, 22:45
Brian Wickman   Re: Review Request 28610: Use requirements.txt for 3rdparty/python. Tue, 02 Dec, 22:46
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 28610: Use requirements.txt for 3rdparty/python. Tue, 02 Dec, 23:06
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28610: Use requirements.txt for 3rdparty/python. Tue, 02 Dec, 23:09
Dave Lester Review Request 28613: Updates documentation README to re-organize around three audiences, and add links to all current documentation pages. Tue, 02 Dec, 23:25
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28613: Updates documentation README to re-organize around three audiences, and add links to all current documentation pages. Tue, 02 Dec, 23:35
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28613: Updates documentation README to re-organize around three audiences, and add links to all current documentation pages. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:21
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:15
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:32
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Fri, 05 Dec, 22:57
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Fri, 05 Dec, 23:12
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Mon, 08 Dec, 19:29
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Mon, 08 Dec, 22:56
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Mon, 08 Dec, 22:57
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:44
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:34
Stephan Erb       Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Fri, 12 Dec, 10:28
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Mon, 15 Dec, 22:40
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Fri, 12 Dec, 18:05
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Fri, 12 Dec, 19:02
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Mon, 15 Dec, 23:12
Kevin Sweeney           Re: Review Request 28617: Implemented offer filtering for tasks with static vetoes. Wed, 24 Dec, 00:26
Zameer Manji Review Request 28621: Prevent Aurora from creating tasks with 0 disk. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:32
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28621: Prevent Aurora from creating tasks with 0 disk. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:33
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28621: Prevent Aurora from creating tasks with 0 disk. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:43
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28621: Prevent Aurora from creating tasks with 0 disk. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:45
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28621: Prevent Aurora from creating tasks with 0 disk. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:51
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28621: Prevent Aurora from creating tasks with 0 disk. Wed, 03 Dec, 01:55
Bill Farner Review Request 28623: Remove getVersion RPC and DEPRECATEDversion Response field. Wed, 03 Dec, 02:13
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28623: Remove getVersion RPC and DEPRECATEDversion Response field. Wed, 03 Dec, 02:18
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28623: Remove getVersion RPC and DEPRECATEDversion Response field. Wed, 03 Dec, 02:18
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28623: Remove getVersion RPC and DEPRECATEDversion Response field. Wed, 03 Dec, 19:41
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28623: Remove getVersion RPC and DEPRECATEDversion Response field. Wed, 03 Dec, 22:05
David McLaughlin   Re: Review Request 28623: Remove getVersion RPC and DEPRECATEDversion Response field. Thu, 04 Dec, 00:15
Bill Farner Review Request 28660: Reduce minimum branch coverage requirement to avoid flakiness. Wed, 03 Dec, 19:02
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28660: Reduce minimum branch coverage requirement to avoid flakiness. Wed, 03 Dec, 19:12
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28660: Reduce minimum branch coverage requirement to avoid flakiness. Wed, 03 Dec, 19:18
Bill Farner Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Wed, 03 Dec, 20:34
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Wed, 03 Dec, 20:46
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Wed, 03 Dec, 20:51
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Wed, 03 Dec, 20:57
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Fri, 05 Dec, 01:09
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Fri, 05 Dec, 01:09
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Fri, 05 Dec, 01:22
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28674: Remove Response.messageDEPRECATED field. Fri, 05 Dec, 01:56
Bill Farner Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Thu, 04 Dec, 00:36
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Thu, 04 Dec, 00:44
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Thu, 04 Dec, 00:58
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Thu, 04 Dec, 01:12
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Fri, 05 Dec, 00:57
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Fri, 05 Dec, 00:58
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Fri, 05 Dec, 01:05
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28682: Drop custom thrift doc generator in favor of the one included in thrift. Fri, 05 Dec, 02:00
Zameer Manji Review Request 28692: Simplify logging in the Aurora client. Thu, 04 Dec, 06:27
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28692: Simplify logging in the Aurora client. Thu, 04 Dec, 06:42
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28692: Simplify logging in the Aurora client. Thu, 04 Dec, 18:21
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28692: Simplify logging in the Aurora client. Thu, 04 Dec, 19:48
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28692: Simplify logging in the Aurora client. Thu, 04 Dec, 19:54
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28692: Simplify logging in the Aurora client. Thu, 04 Dec, 20:00
Zameer Manji Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 06:36
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 06:36
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 06:51
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 07:02
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 17:21
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 17:26
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 17:39
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 18:14
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 18:23
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28693: Make abstract method annotations on ConfigurationPlugin effective. Thu, 04 Dec, 18:26
Zameer Manji Review Request 28696: Use abstract decorators in CommandLine class. Thu, 04 Dec, 07:40
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28696: Use abstract decorators in CommandLine class. Thu, 04 Dec, 07:52
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28696: Use abstract decorators in CommandLine class. Thu, 04 Dec, 19:06
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28696: Use abstract decorators in CommandLine class. Mon, 08 Dec, 17:58
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28696: Use abstract decorators in CommandLine class. Mon, 08 Dec, 17:59
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Thu, 04 Dec, 19:36
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Thu, 04 Dec, 19:44
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Thu, 04 Dec, 20:12
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Thu, 04 Dec, 20:20
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Thu, 04 Dec, 20:20
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Thu, 04 Dec, 20:25
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Fri, 05 Dec, 18:32
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Fri, 05 Dec, 18:54
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Fri, 05 Dec, 19:42
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Sat, 06 Dec, 00:32
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Fri, 05 Dec, 20:06
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Fri, 05 Dec, 20:29
Bill Farner         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Fri, 05 Dec, 20:32
Bill Farner         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 00:54
Kevin Sweeney         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:30
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Sat, 06 Dec, 00:33
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Sat, 06 Dec, 00:52
Kevin Sweeney         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:09
Maxim Khutornenko           Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:22
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:22
Kevin Sweeney           Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:30
Aurora ReviewBot           Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:35
Bill Farner           Re: Review Request 28710: Adding JMH framework support for scheduler performance analysis. Wed, 10 Dec, 18:04
Re: Review Request 28474: Added manual perf tests for the scheduling pipeline.
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28474: Added manual perf tests for the scheduling pipeline. Thu, 04 Dec, 19:39
Zameer Manji Review Request 28728: Collect HTTP stats on every request. Thu, 04 Dec, 23:44
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28728: Collect HTTP stats on every request. Thu, 04 Dec, 23:49
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28728: Collect HTTP stats on every request. Thu, 04 Dec, 23:51
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28728: Collect HTTP stats on every request. Thu, 04 Dec, 23:55
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28728: Collect HTTP stats on every request. Thu, 04 Dec, 23:56
Bill Farner Review Request 28725: Remove redundant storage.write. Fri, 05 Dec, 00:20
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28725: Remove redundant storage.write. Fri, 05 Dec, 00:21
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28725: Remove redundant storage.write. Fri, 05 Dec, 00:31
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Fri, 05 Dec, 01:27
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Fri, 05 Dec, 01:31
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Fri, 05 Dec, 23:02
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Fri, 05 Dec, 23:12
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Thu, 11 Dec, 20:37
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Thu, 11 Dec, 20:45
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Thu, 11 Dec, 20:53
Bill Farner         Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Thu, 11 Dec, 22:28
Maxim Khutornenko           Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Mon, 15 Dec, 22:15
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Mon, 15 Dec, 22:15
Aurora ReviewBot           Re: Review Request 28731: Implemented TaskScheduler benchmarks. Mon, 15 Dec, 22:58
Bill Farner Review Request 28738: Remove unused DefaultServlet subclass. Fri, 05 Dec, 04:06
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28738: Remove unused DefaultServlet subclass. Fri, 05 Dec, 04:24
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28738: Remove unused DefaultServlet subclass. Fri, 05 Dec, 17:27
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28738: Remove unused DefaultServlet subclass. Fri, 05 Dec, 18:33
Zameer Manji Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 07:17
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 07:22
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 07:26
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 07:34
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 07:43
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 08:12
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 20:37
Zameer Manji         Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 20:46
Bill Farner         Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Fri, 05 Dec, 20:49
Zameer Manji         Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Sat, 06 Dec, 00:16
Bill Farner         Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Sat, 06 Dec, 01:13
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 19:57
Zameer Manji         Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 19:58
Bill Farner           Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:11
Aurora ReviewBot           Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:15
Maxim Khutornenko           Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:33
Zameer Manji             Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:50
Maxim Khutornenko             Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 21:16
Zameer Manji             Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:18
Zameer Manji           Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:50
Aurora ReviewBot             Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:55
Zameer Manji             Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:18
Aurora ReviewBot               Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:33
Maxim Khutornenko               Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:34
Maxim Khutornenko               Re: Review Request 28742: Simplify logging in the client. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:37
Bill Farner Review Request 28771: Don't fall back to old command syntax in the new client. Fri, 05 Dec, 21:12
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28771: Don't fall back to old command syntax in the new client. Fri, 05 Dec, 21:29
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28771: Don't fall back to old command syntax in the new client. Fri, 05 Dec, 21:33
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28771: Don't fall back to old command syntax in the new client. Fri, 05 Dec, 22:48
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28806: More logging in MaintenanceController. Mon, 08 Dec, 19:53
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28806: More logging in MaintenanceController. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:14
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28806: More logging in MaintenanceController. Mon, 08 Dec, 20:19
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 21:13
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 21:21
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 21:37
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 21:42
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 21:41
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 22:43
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:24
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28811: Improving logging experience in admin drain_hosts. Mon, 08 Dec, 23:52
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 01:25
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 01:42
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 02:33
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 18:12
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 18:14
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 18:27
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 19:50
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 20:18
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Tue, 09 Dec, 20:34
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28831: Changing the default --batch-size to 1. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:43
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Tue, 09 Dec, 21:30
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Tue, 09 Dec, 21:37
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Tue, 09 Dec, 23:41
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Thu, 11 Dec, 02:54
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Thu, 11 Dec, 02:54
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Thu, 11 Dec, 02:55
Zameer Manji       Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Thu, 11 Dec, 03:22
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Thu, 11 Dec, 03:57
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Thu, 11 Dec, 20:00
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 28872: Improving quota check message in the client. Wed, 24 Dec, 00:21
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Tue, 09 Dec, 22:32
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Tue, 09 Dec, 22:46
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Tue, 09 Dec, 23:29
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Tue, 09 Dec, 23:47
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Wed, 10 Dec, 00:11
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Wed, 10 Dec, 00:23
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Wed, 10 Dec, 00:51
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Wed, 10 Dec, 02:04
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:37
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Thu, 11 Dec, 02:52
Zameer Manji     Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Thu, 11 Dec, 03:23
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Thu, 11 Dec, 03:23
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Thu, 11 Dec, 20:21
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28876: Suppressing redundant client command error messaging. Thu, 11 Dec, 20:35
Zameer Manji Review Request 28879: Make abstract decorators effective in CommandHook class Tue, 09 Dec, 23:36
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28879: Make abstract decorators effective in CommandHook class Tue, 09 Dec, 23:45
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28879: Make abstract decorators effective in CommandHook class Thu, 11 Dec, 23:55
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28879: Make abstract decorators effective in CommandHook class Fri, 12 Dec, 00:40
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28879: Make abstract decorators effective in CommandHook class Fri, 12 Dec, 00:41
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28883: Fixing @Timed method visibility. Wed, 10 Dec, 00:59
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28883: Fixing @Timed method visibility. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:06
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28883: Fixing @Timed method visibility. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:07
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28883: Fixing @Timed method visibility. Wed, 10 Dec, 01:08
Bill Farner Review Request 28913: Remove SANDBOX_DELETED state. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:40
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28913: Remove SANDBOX_DELETED state. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:41
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28913: Remove SANDBOX_DELETED state. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:58
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28913: Remove SANDBOX_DELETED state. Tue, 16 Dec, 00:48
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28913: Remove SANDBOX_DELETED state. Wed, 24 Dec, 00:20
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:57
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 19:59
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:00
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:02
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:01
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:06
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:02
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:06
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:17
Kevin Sweeney       Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 20:31
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 22:37
Bill Farner       Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 21:07
Maxim Khutornenko         Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 22:36
Maxim Khutornenko       Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 22:37
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 28914: Adding PMD rule to check @Timed annotation placement. Wed, 10 Dec, 23:01
Bill Farner Review Request 28915: Use pip to pre-fetch python dependencies. Wed, 10 Dec, 21:26
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28915: Use pip to pre-fetch python dependencies. Wed, 10 Dec, 21:35
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28915: Use pip to pre-fetch python dependencies. Wed, 10 Dec, 21:39
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28915: Use pip to pre-fetch python dependencies. Wed, 10 Dec, 21:48
Kevin Sweeney     Re: Review Request 28915: Use pip to pre-fetch python dependencies. Wed, 10 Dec, 22:03
Maxim Khutornenko     Re: Review Request 28915: Use pip to pre-fetch python dependencies. Wed, 10 Dec, 22:42
Steve Niemitz Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Wed, 10 Dec, 22:28
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Wed, 10 Dec, 23:12
Bill Farner   Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Thu, 11 Dec, 06:16
Steve Niemitz     Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Thu, 11 Dec, 15:19
Steve Niemitz   Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Thu, 11 Dec, 06:16
Aurora ReviewBot     Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Thu, 11 Dec, 15:54
Jay Buffington     Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Sat, 13 Dec, 01:59
Jay Buffington       Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Sat, 13 Dec, 04:25
Steve Niemitz       Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Tue, 16 Dec, 21:19
Steve Niemitz       Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Fri, 26 Dec, 17:29
Steve Niemitz     Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Tue, 16 Dec, 21:19
Aurora ReviewBot       Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Tue, 16 Dec, 21:54
Jay Buffington       Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Tue, 16 Dec, 22:06
Jay Buffington       Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Wed, 17 Dec, 03:01
Steve Niemitz       Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Fri, 26 Dec, 21:05
Aurora ReviewBot         Re: Review Request 28920: Add support for docker containers to aurora Fri, 26 Dec, 21:54
Re: Review Request 28198: Add an example on how to build with Docker.
Tony Dong   Re: Review Request 28198: Add an example on how to build with Docker. Thu, 11 Dec, 18:32
Bill Farner     Re: Review Request 28198: Add an example on how to build with Docker. Thu, 11 Dec, 19:37
Jay Buffington     Re: Review Request 28198: Add an example on how to build with Docker. Fri, 12 Dec, 16:52
Tony Dong       Re: Review Request 28198: Add an example on how to build with Docker. Fri, 12 Dec, 16:57
Bill Farner Review Request 28971: Begin dismantling client v1. Thu, 11 Dec, 22:53
Zameer Manji   Re: Review Request 28971: Begin dismantling client v1. Thu, 11 Dec, 22:56
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 28971: Begin dismantling client v1. Thu, 11 Dec, 23:57
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 28971: Begin dismantling client v1. Tue, 16 Dec, 00:18
Maxim Khutornenko Review Request 29005: Changing log level for the RequestLogger. Fri, 12 Dec, 19:41
Kevin Sweeney   Re: Review Request 29005: Changing log level for the RequestLogger. Fri, 12 Dec, 19:43
Joshua Cohen   Re: Review Request 29005: Changing log level for the RequestLogger. Fri, 12 Dec, 19:55
Aurora ReviewBot   Re: Review Request 29005: Changing log level for the RequestLogger. Fri, 12 Dec, 19:56
Maxim Khutornenko   Re: Review Request 29005: Changing log level for the RequestLogger. Mon, 15 Dec, 20:50
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Feb 20204
Jan 202018
Dec 201921
Nov 201926
Oct 201911
Sep 201958
Aug 201928
Jul 20195
Jun 201923
May 20191
Mar 20194
Feb 20196
Jan 20191
Dec 20181
Nov 201811
Oct 201871
Sep 201871
Aug 201823
Jul 201871
Jun 201893
May 2018146
Apr 201894
Mar 2018136
Feb 2018101
Jan 2018127
Dec 2017220
Nov 2017226
Oct 2017607
Sep 2017189
Aug 201788
Jul 201762
Jun 2017256
May 2017169
Apr 2017174
Mar 2017211
Feb 2017252
Jan 2017277
Dec 2016347
Nov 2016286
Oct 2016417
Sep 2016613
Aug 2016344
Jul 2016227
Jun 2016224
May 2016299
Apr 2016548
Mar 2016655
Feb 2016337
Jan 2016735
Dec 2015580
Nov 2015304
Oct 2015229
Sep 2015385
Aug 2015488
Jul 2015418
Jun 2015324
May 2015403
Apr 2015470
Mar 2015676
Feb 2015873
Jan 2015780
Dec 2014439
Nov 2014766
Oct 20141033
Sep 2014705
Aug 2014357
Jul 2014400
Jun 2014431
May 2014661
Apr 2014475
Mar 2014498
Feb 2014556
Jan 2014450