aurora-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brian Wickman" <wick...@apache.org>
Subject Review Request 22280: Implement a TRequestsClient as a prelude to kerberization.
Date Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:58:43 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22280/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney and Mark Chu-Carroll.


Repository: aurora


Description
-------

Implement a TRequestsClient as a prelude to kerberization.

Sending out for early feedback.  This could probably be shipped as-is but curious to see how
people feel about this approach.  This is the first bit of AURORA-515.  To add kerberos support,
we just need to add a dependency on requests_kerberos and inject KerberosAuth() as the 'auth='
parameter to TRequestsClient with the proper service principal specified.


Diffs
-----

  src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/api/BUILD 6968d62e663a3d45b86d665ca4090be49e6426a6

  src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/api/scheduler_client.py 86ccdd982ddd678a8eb86f3d7be2761ced1d7b6c

  src/main/python/apache/aurora/common/BUILD 0de0cf76c0f19a6cee44cfb558096d2ff010a014 
  src/main/python/apache/aurora/common/transport.py PRE-CREATION 
  src/test/python/apache/aurora/client/api/test_scheduler_client.py 6b23a4a5e23f0724e418cefaadb2429480353272


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22280/diff/


Testing
-------

Updated client/api tests for the new transport.


Thanks,

Brian Wickman


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message