aurora-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mehrdad Nurolahzade (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AURORA-133) write_lock_wait_nanos stat is misleading and of little use
Date Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:38:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15687366#comment-15687366
] 

Mehrdad Nurolahzade commented on AURORA-133:
--------------------------------------------

[~wfarner] Would you care to elaborate? I am not sure if I am following your point here.

> write_lock_wait_nanos stat is misleading and of little use
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-133
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-133
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Scheduler
>            Reporter: Bill Farner
>            Priority: Minor
>
> {{write_lock_wait_nanos}} is not useful since intrinsic lock on {{LogStorage}} will be
contended for and held by the time the read/write lock is acquired



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message