aurora-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benjamin Staffin (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AURORA-1556) Configuring an http health checker without binding a health port should be considered invalid configuration
Date Sun, 10 Jan 2016 01:09:39 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15090844#comment-15090844
] 

Benjamin Staffin commented on AURORA-1556:
------------------------------------------

Alternatively, could the health checker use the task's default port if there is not a health
port explicitly assigned?  That's the behavior I would have expected as a new user.

> Configuring an http health checker without binding a health port should be considered
invalid configuration
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1556
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1556
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Executor, Thermos
>            Reporter: Joshua Cohen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Today if you configure an http health checker but don't bind a health port, we do not
perform any health checks. Arguably this is invalid configuration and the task should be rejected.
If you'd like to disable health checks (e.g. for a devel task), then no health check config
should be present.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message