aurora-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Farner (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AURORA-1209) the aurora scheduler should proxy the executor UI
Date Fri, 20 Mar 2015 04:41:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14370711#comment-14370711
] 

Bill Farner commented on AURORA-1209:
-------------------------------------

I think the scheduler has information it can and should display for an instance (see AURORA-97).
 However, proxying still has merit and should be considered.

> the aurora scheduler should proxy the executor UI
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1209
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1209
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Story
>          Components: Scheduler
>            Reporter: brian wickman
>
> Right now there are meaningful endpoints for:
>   /scheduler
>   /scheduler/role
>   /scheduler/role/env
>   /scheduler/role/env/jobname
> But no meaningful endpoint for
>   /scheduler/role/env/jobname/instanceid
> It would be a much better user experience if the scheduler had a simple HTTP proxy to
proxy the executor UI (if defined by the ExecutorConfig.)  This will simplify migrating the
thermos observer into the executor and provide a much better story for deploying Aurora (one
less required moving part.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message