aurora-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Lambert (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (AURORA-1159) NearestFix does not account for certain veto types
Date Mon, 02 Mar 2015 22:35:05 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Chris Lambert updated AURORA-1159:
----------------------------------
    Story Points: 5

> NearestFix does not account for certain veto types
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1159
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1159
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Scheduler
>            Reporter: Maxim Khutornenko
>            Assignee: Maxim Khutornenko
>
> Most of the current Veto types are scored with the same fixed MAX_SCORE value that prevents
NearestFit to give proper attention to maintenance and constraint limit vetoes. Improved veto
scoring should improve the pending reason quality reporting.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message