aurora-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Joe Smith (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (AURORA-175) thermos runner should discriminate failures using exit status
Date Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:34:29 GMT


Joe Smith updated AURORA-175:
    Priority: Critical  (was: Minor)

> thermos runner should discriminate failures using exit status
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: AURORA-175
>                 URL:
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Executor, Thermos
>            Reporter: brian wickman
>            Priority: Critical
> We do the correct thing on the executor side when there is a configuration/interpolation
problem (report FAILURE.)
> On the thermos_runner side, we don't exit with a separate exit status for bad configuration,
nor do we even pay attention to the exit status from the thermos executor.  So when the runner
exits unexpectedly, that's always treated as a LOST.  Instead there should be a contract between
the thermos_runner and thermos_executor about certain classes of failures indicated by exit
statuses so that we can differentiate between legit LOST and FAILURE, for example if the user
no longer exists on the box.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message