aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joshua Cohen <jco...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Rollback Testing
Date Wed, 03 Feb 2016 01:42:40 GMT
Ok, I'll file a ticket to at least track the intent. We'll see if I have
time to work on it or if it just languishes (anyone else interested, feel
free to pick it up as well of course ;)).

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:

> Yes.  Our nightly packaging builds take advantage of this.
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Joshua Cohen <jcohen@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I know the blocker for e2e tests in CI previously was the ability to run
> > vagrant. Is running docker from CI doable today?
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Definitely a nice thing to have, the big uncertainty will be whether
> > anyone
> > > cares enough to see the effort through.
> > >
> > > e2e tests in jenkins can be done, but likely only if e2e tests start
> > using
> > > docker instead of vagrant.  I am supportive of both, but cannot
> > personally
> > > invest the time at the moment.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Joshua Cohen <jcohen@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Another topic that came up today's IRC meeting was possibly adding
> some
> > > > sort of automated rollback testing between builds. This is related to
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1603 which was caused
> by
> > an
> > > > inability to rollback to an earlier commit after discovering
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1605.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure what's feasible in the immediate future. To me the most
> > > > obvious solution would be to run the e2e tests as part of our CI job,
> > and
> > > > have the last step of the job be to checkout HEAD^ and
> rebuild/restart
> > > the
> > > > scheduler. This is predicated on actually running the e2e tests as
> part
> > > of
> > > > CI though, which historically has been difficult for us to achieve
> > (see:
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-127).
> > > >
> > > > Curious to hear thoughts on this. It's clearly more beneficial to
> those
> > > > deploying from master rather than from official releases (though it
> > would
> > > > be great, at least, as part of the release verification process to
> > ensure
> > > > we can rollback to the previous release). Do folks think this would
> be
> > > > beneficial, or is it overkill?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Joshua
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message