aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Rollback Testing
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:28:36 GMT
Yes.  Our nightly packaging builds take advantage of this.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Joshua Cohen <jcohen@apache.org> wrote:

> I know the blocker for e2e tests in CI previously was the ability to run
> vagrant. Is running docker from CI doable today?
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Definitely a nice thing to have, the big uncertainty will be whether
> anyone
> > cares enough to see the effort through.
> >
> > e2e tests in jenkins can be done, but likely only if e2e tests start
> using
> > docker instead of vagrant.  I am supportive of both, but cannot
> personally
> > invest the time at the moment.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Joshua Cohen <jcohen@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Another topic that came up today's IRC meeting was possibly adding some
> > > sort of automated rollback testing between builds. This is related to
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1603 which was caused by
> an
> > > inability to rollback to an earlier commit after discovering
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1605.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what's feasible in the immediate future. To me the most
> > > obvious solution would be to run the e2e tests as part of our CI job,
> and
> > > have the last step of the job be to checkout HEAD^ and rebuild/restart
> > the
> > > scheduler. This is predicated on actually running the e2e tests as part
> > of
> > > CI though, which historically has been difficult for us to achieve
> (see:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-127).
> > >
> > > Curious to hear thoughts on this. It's clearly more beneficial to those
> > > deploying from master rather than from official releases (though it
> would
> > > be great, at least, as part of the release verification process to
> ensure
> > > we can rollback to the previous release). Do folks think this would be
> > > beneficial, or is it overkill?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Joshua
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message