aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Farner <>
Subject Re: Deprecation Cycles
Date Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:35:35 GMT
Sounds reasonable.  Can you firm up the proposal and apply numbers?

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Joshua Cohen <> wrote:

> This came up briefly last week, and we also discussed in the IRC meeting
> today. Given the increased release cadence, I think we would benefit from
> moving from release-based deprecation to time-based. That is to say,
> instead of deprecating in release X and removing release X+1, we would
> deprecate in release X and remove no less than N later and at least M
> releases later.
> General consensus in the IRC meeting was in favor, however I wanted to
> start a thread to discuss to gather additional feedback and if everyone is
> in agreement, then we can solidify the actual details on what the new
> deprecation policy should be.
> Cheers,
> Joshua

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message