Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9166A18022 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4381 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 14:09:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 4331 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 14:09:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aurora.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 4320 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2016 14:09:21 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:09:21 +0000 Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com (mail-lf0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 14F9F1A0015 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c192so175888413lfe.2 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:09:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.90.13 with SMTP id o13mr29149417lfb.114.1452262159337; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 06:09:19 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: jfarrell@apache.org Received: by 10.112.13.33 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 06:09:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <568F9261.8000300@blue-yonder.com> References: <568F9261.8000300@blue-yonder.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:09:19 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs From: Jake Farrell To: dev@aurora.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114122d220d82f0528d32269 --001a114122d220d82f0528d32269 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I pushed the api bindings for 0.8 to repository.a.o [1] after a one off vote for that specific binary artifact, but we never incorporated that as part of our official release process. we need to look into making the convenience binaries (deb, rpm, jar) easier to package and assemble for a vote at some point -Jake [1]: https://repository.apache.org/#nexus-search;quick~aurora On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Matthias Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Am 27.12.2015 um 00:21 schrieb benley@gmail.com: > > I've been producing a set of Mesos debs that are not derived from the > > Mesosphere packages, with the goal of having a set of debs that follow > > Debian conventions and packaging policies as closely as I can get them. > > Great work. This are far more advanced than what I have hacked together > so far. Especially adding all those man-pages=E2=80=A6 > > Is there any particular reason you did not include the Java bindings, > though? Or have I just been too blind to find them? > > Regards, > Matthias > > -- > Dr. Matthias Bach > Senior Software Engineer > *Blue Yonder GmbH* > Ohiostra=C3=9Fe 8 > D-76149 Karlsruhe > > Tel +49 (0)721 383 117 6244 > Fax +49 (0)721 383 117 69 > > matthias.bach@blue-yonder.com > www.blue-yonder.com > Registergericht Mannheim, HRB 704547 > USt-IdNr. DE DE 277 091 535 > Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Jochen Bossert, Uwe Weiss (CEO) > > > --001a114122d220d82f0528d32269--