aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.10.0-1 debs
Date Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:54:42 GMT
+1 (binding). All debs installed successfully with the right release versions.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
> Ping?  I would love to get more binding votes to determine how to move
> forward with this vote.
>
> On Friday, December 11, 2015, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> This vote did not pass, as we only had one binding vote.  I don't see any
>> harm in extending the vote duration to get more binding votes, however.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Joshua Cohen <jcohen@apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jcohen@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Did this vote pass? I don't see the 0.10.0 debs on bintray (or a result
>>> thread).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Cohen <jcohen@apache.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jcohen@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yeah, I agree, that would be preferable.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:27 PM, John Sirois <john@conductant.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','john@conductant.com');>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Joshua Cohen <jcohen@apache.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jcohen@apache.org');>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > +1
>>> >> >
>>> >> > One minor nit, not sure if it's worth fixing:
>>> >> > test/deb/ubuntu-trusty/README.md still references 0.9.0, should
be
>>> >> updated
>>> >> > to 0.10.0?
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> I'd be more in favor of a clarifying phrase like 'for example ...' than
>>> >> changing this text for every package release.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM, John Sirois <john@conductant.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','john@conductant.com');>>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wfarner@apache.org');>>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the
official
>>> deb
>>> >> > > > packaging for
>>> >> > > > Apache Aurora 0.10.0.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.10.0-1/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > The Aurora deb packaging includes the following:
>>> >> > > > ---
>>> >> > > > The CHANGELOG is available at:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=blob_plain;f=specs/debian/changelog;hb=refs/heads/0.10.x
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > The branch used to create the packaging is:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.10.x
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > The packages are available at:
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.10.0-1/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available
at:
>>> >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > Please download, verify, and test.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > The vote will close in 5 business days, on Thu Dec 4
8:00:00 PT
>>> 2015
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora
0.10.0
>>> >> > > > [ ] +0
>>> >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > I would like to get the voting started off with my own
+1
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > +1 nonbinding
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Tested via the test/deb/ubuntu-trusty vm.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > --
>>> >> > > John Sirois
>>> >> > > 303-512-3301
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> John Sirois
>>> >> 303-512-3301
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message