aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Use standard logging practices
Date Tue, 29 Dec 2015 23:57:20 GMT
I don't have a strong opinion about logback vs log4j.  Can you summarize
some of the tradeoffs?

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Jeff Schroeder <jeffschroeder@computer.org>
wrote:

> What about using logback instead of log4j? It has some interesting benefits
> over log4j and we wouldn't be the first large mesos framework to switch to
> it.
>
> Personally, I'd love to see glog burn and die in a fire.
>
> On Monday, December 28, 2015, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > We're currently using some logging scaffolding carried over from Twitter
> > commons.  I would like to propose that we dismantle some of this in favor
> > of more standard java application logging conventions.
> >
> > Concretely, i propose we remove the following scheduler command line
> > arguments:
> > -logtostderr
> > -alsologtostderr
> > -vlog
> > -vmodule
> > -use_glog_formatter
> >
> > Instead of these, we can allow users to customize logging via standard
> > java.util.logging inputs (e.g. logging.properties).  We could explore
> using
> > an alternative to java.util.logging, but i suggest we retain that backend
> > for now (since it's what we're currently using).
> >
>
>
> --
> Text by Jeff, typos by iPhone
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message