Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@aurora.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFWq12XWb0q6wA=zT6ssan4AYG8V-9ZDRVOoG+hwTvoBjD1i-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAKeVu008Z6LLtsm6roB_STMWXF70TCNv-Xn48sf_E1NYvykD+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGofrHNHvOGH9MDt-VqWtsYydCE08ywFJHeugR5zNJJBC5K4Tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFWq12UFf=gX9TBWz7hTzTWwjEyJyRk7Yn6EvRdGn3gw1QvSww@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK7Zj11g2N=Kc6azibzhfpLcNHdFfhb-AoGb93Yuckj-rmi5xw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFWq12XWb0q6wA=zT6ssan4AYG8V-9ZDRVOoG+hwTvoBjD1i-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zameer Manji <zmanji@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:51:09 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAK7Zj12h62Vbz8y3v4BwwjwwMz3=wS-FDNwwqBkHM+TW3RMxdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mac OSX brew aurora-cli support
To: dev@aurora.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c06c1588664dd05254eab18

--94eb2c06c1588664dd05254eab18
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Sounds reasonable to me. Someone can then update the formula to fetch our
offical binary.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:

> I realized what i said was unclear.  I actually intended the same - use
> brew, but have brew just fetch a binary we host.  Is that reasonable?
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Zameer Manji <zmanji@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > That's awesome, thanks for doing that!  Any sense if it would be better
> > for
> > > us to host an official OS X binary?  Would make the install much
> > snappier,
> > > at least.
> > >
> >
> > I think hosting an official OSX binary and perhaps
> suggesting/recommending
> > this installation method for OSX in our docs would good for our users.
> >
> > --
> > Zameer Manji
> >
>
> --
> Zameer Manji
>
>

--94eb2c06c1588664dd05254eab18--