Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05582184BF for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31799 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2015 20:06:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 31745 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2015 20:06:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aurora.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 31734 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2015 20:06:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 20:06:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1E3A8F0D57 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:06:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.971 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.971 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xm2ad5ejjAsa for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5FCD720EFB for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ex2013-1.phi-tps.local ([85.115.23.42]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNLx3-1ZdXxq1OmX-006w8G for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 22:06:27 +0200 Received: from ex2013-2.phi-tps.local (10.1.1.3) by ex2013-1.phi-tps.local (10.1.1.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:06:26 +0200 Received: from ex2013-2.phi-tps.local ([fe80::90be:dfde:72c3:78b5]) by ex2013-2.phi-tps.local ([fe80::90be:dfde:72c3:78b5%23]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:06:26 +0200 From: "Erb, Stephan" To: "dev@aurora.apache.org" Subject: Meaning and usage of job environments Thread-Topic: Meaning and usage of job environments Thread-Index: AQHQ5bkhYgRUc9QOXk6bo2r/CuVfdA== Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:06:25 +0000 Message-ID: <1441224385149.41386@blue-yonder.com> Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-process: ESTProcessDone x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.193.0.30] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OwySHRsnS1TXLOTgDAIbzHKARx6yMBFT11npFBhIUDbsHOQqNdQ Z8+5DM8DQnahyPf05A0TBe5iAu1mHeCJPbS2794auNp5jUCzAn4+1vwBvhJxpd2J9wRVFUw YUrB88+4hIyaYZXfRQhDbtyAqOCG8u0EZ5CsoSTMNLVhKdDPqqsxW1xPEciGF6e1tURj+Ol /TqY3loSB00IGYU1pry0A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:wNvqYsLz/W8=:Y4F02rE4184BHXK4P4eiq8 QrQ2V2FejVH0XjYghLmkjShksjRu5WDzhkmyNu32hxNfTQ6EfYKJEqf9Tn3vlfHgE9bliLmSU OSiUbZ+SimGRh6LdKhAC+2vKOrVXbp+EvazNzVa4Ps8uh82cOGMDVVEX9MaRnfYJ6ZUW/T0mf XQu54RaaXsH9Ku88jUNZ6VuDgpPxUaEzeGhHZZp7pjjZN3E/IoVmaEIIeMI5Fmm4i0JgHHgvi pEV/uk0eZ8hAT4JM7ppUreHRPaQ60SClCnnN1BDKV3t73oOGSk/y9Nji1Sb/2NEgN8+FER0PS Af0yvRw1WJKQG+ObQlYp/8ABXffpdYq+oFlCAAnJVYk29OJmy3pgByTZoOIKXX7+tKEiero7r /QjKEf3fjo4V/W8nwOpjXT9YyCzcqBw7B+yWEmdHNEVJJm+uuqTa9RphM0Ahscfwfy471b27G 9lbjsvdZ5c8jYD4+zdsSCiiO0xs08aq+9R/Y89ZvwDmBFI64DKbMd8GHxKpVMmpx7vUooolHy PcxI9ZAaYd38g4ZlTjKBJMWw9X6kAVuPcao03uz49UtzNB95YeMvAOyua1sp9mXutzTxi2rdM lwqmkTzDgIrgq/2eHRraxTi2Jq7keaD4ajg+MSbicsWDRCHglrZMx3FJ2dNlD3PgW+GZqX1t0 hxk0YHVUXZo0OXrGgZuozdU40ZGiUZqsje5XN5qpnjzdghel7L3IrATRh1w4ZL3ywP712NTSL F9p2iwif7aWryAKn Hi everyone,=0A= =0A= I have been wondering about the environment part of Aurora jobkeys (devel, = test, staging, staging1, ...prod). =0A= =0A= I guess you made the environment a first class citizen in order to enforce = some kind of standardization. How is this working out for you in practice? = =0A= =0A= IIRC, the current set of supported environment names is enforced by the cli= ent. In general, would you be opposed to moving this validation to the sche= duler, so that it can be configured cluster wide? This would enable us to i= ntroduce environment names which are closer to our domain and organization.= Or is this even somewhat covered in the upcoming job tier implementation?= =0A= =0A= Thanks for your input,=0A= Stephan=