aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 0.10.0 Feature Requests
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:40:52 GMT
It looks like the tickets for 0.10.0 already existed and I have assigned
them to myself:
RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1250
Deprecations: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1367
Breaking Changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1251

It looks like the tickets Bill referenced are already linked to the ticket
so we are good to go.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org> wrote:

> can agree with that, just dont want to see us forget about it and have
> stale code sitting around. moved to the 0.10 deprecations epic
>
> -Jake
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > TODO cleanup seems to be an ongoing process, and much like documentation
> -
> > i think it's tricky to put on a roadmap.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > we should probably spend some time before .10 going through and
> cleaning
> > up
> > > deprecation todo's left in the code also. I've added this to the Aurora
> > > Roadmap Google doc
> > >
> > > -Jake
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I agree, documentation overhauls are best decoupled from releases.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Think that this is a great idea and agree that we need to spend
> some
> > > time
> > > > > improving our user content, but it should not be a blocker to the
> > next
> > > > > release candidate. Improving our documentation and website should
> be
> > an
> > > > > ongoing effort
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jake
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Zameer Manji <zmanji@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > One thing I would like to see in 0.10.0 is improvement to our
> > > > > > documentation. We have a lot of documentation but I don't think
> it
> > is
> > > > > well
> > > > > > organized or very accessible to a new user or a prospective
user.
> > > This
> > > > > > might involve writing new documentation, improving our, website,
> > etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In 0.10.0 i would like to see:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - groundwork and initial endpoints in a REST API (part
of
> > > AURORA-987)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - thermos executor support for a simple task description.
 this
> > > would
> > > > > be
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > dramatically reduced json schema that the executor can
consume
> > for
> > > > > simple
> > > > > > > use cases where the user is invoking a single shell command
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - support for custom executors (AURORA-1376)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Zameer Manji <
> > zmanji@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As discussed in today's IRC meeting I will be heading
up the
> > > 0.10.0
> > > > > > > > release. What would people like to see in this release?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Zameer Manji
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Zameer Manji
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Zameer Manji
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message