aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zameer Manji <zma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Forking twitter-commons into our tree
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:20:01 GMT
Just to be clear, I'm proposing forking the java parts only.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Joseph Smith <yasumoto7@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also a (tough to concede) +1. Although I’m not a fan of the fork, it will
> help improve velocity and empower a migration away from twitter common.
>
> > On Jul 3, 2015, at 8:15 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > That's roughly the eventual plan, which this move would help us
> facilitate.
> > We use guava heavily already, most of our current dependence is on ZK
> and args handling code...but we would look towards dep-shallow alternatives.
> >
> >
> >
> >    _____________________________
> > From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015 8:03 AM
> > Subject: Re: Forking twitter-commons into our tree
> > To:  <dev@aurora.apache.org>
> > Cc: Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
> >
> >
> > I'll see what I can do about IP clearance.
> >
> > For giggles, how much work do you think it would be to shed
> twitter-commons
> > and just rely on guava and other what I would consider more standard
> > libraries.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, Jake!
> >>
> >> -=Bill
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> yes, makes it easier to donate when its Apache License 2.0, but still
> >>> requires the IP clearance [1], which is handled through the IPMC. This
> is
> >>> required so there is an audit trail of that software being donated to
> the
> >>> ASF
> >>>
> >>> -Jake
> >>>
> >>> [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Jake - i'm not fully versed on licenses, but is that true even though
> >>> it's
> >>>> all Apache License 2.0?
> >>>>
> >>>> -=Bill
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> no objections, but we would have to get an IP clearance doc from
> >>> Twitter
> >>>>> for this code in order to bring this code into the ASF
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Jake
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Zameer Manji <zmanji@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hey,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Aurora depends heavily on twitter-commons for lots of
> >> functionality.
> >>>>>> However upstream is not very active and I suspect that it will
be
> >>> less
> >>>>>> active in the future. Currently we depend on artifacts published
> >> from
> >>>>> this
> >>>>>> project which causes us to depend on older versions of guava
and
> >>> guice.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As a result, it seems that will be difficult to address tickets
> >> like
> >>>>>> AURORA-1380 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1380>
> >>>> without
> >>>>>> changing something. I propose we fork all of the java portions
of
> >>>>>> twitter-commons into our tree, remove the parts we don't use
and
> >>> update
> >>>>>> guava and guice so we can move forward on this front.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What are people's thoughts on this?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Zameer Manji
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Chris Aniszczyk
> > http://aniszczyk.org
> > +1 512 961 6719
>
> --
> Zameer Manji
>
> <%2B1%20512%20961%206719>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message