aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Farner <wfar...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Forking twitter-commons into our tree
Date Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:41:22 GMT
Jake - i'm not fully versed on licenses, but is that true even though it's
all Apache License 2.0?

-=Bill

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org> wrote:

> no objections, but we would have to get an IP clearance doc from Twitter
> for this code in order to bring this code into the ASF
>
> -Jake
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Zameer Manji <zmanji@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > Aurora depends heavily on twitter-commons for lots of functionality.
> > However upstream is not very active and I suspect that it will be less
> > active in the future. Currently we depend on artifacts published from
> this
> > project which causes us to depend on older versions of guava and guice.
> >
> > As a result, it seems that will be difficult to address tickets like
> > AURORA-1380 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1380> without
> > changing something. I propose we fork all of the java portions of
> > twitter-commons into our tree, remove the parts we don't use and update
> > guava and guice so we can move forward on this front.
> >
> > What are people's thoughts on this?
> >
> > --
> > Zameer Manji
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message