Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 524AB17F52 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 23:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52085 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2015 23:14:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 52035 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2015 23:14:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aurora.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 52024 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2015 23:14:36 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 23:14:36 +0000 Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id BC31A1A01B4 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 23:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcrf4 with SMTP id f4so85216807qcr.0 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:14:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPRJEJiEQhekEl+s3+nCqtJ9D+vkxCmWS3DAkvX/cakzHRy/Al5+Lkg/rtOw0Kk5OfyyhM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.132.199 with SMTP id 190mr5460574qhe.24.1428102874892; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.64.131 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:14:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 16:14:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deprecating "restart_theshold" setting From: Bill Farner To: "dev@aurora.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11350fd28fa9430512da1cf2 --001a11350fd28fa9430512da1cf2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've prepared a minimal patch to remove this behavior from the scheduler: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32840/ -=3DBill On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > The bright side is that you (the cluster administrator) can buffer for > this in only the global task timeout setting, and it doesn't have to leak > into everyone's update configurations. > > -=3DBill > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Steve Niemitz wrote= : > >> oh hm, I thought it started as soon as the task was launched, if it >> already >> starts the timer at RUNNING never mind then :) >> >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Maxim Khutornenko >> wrote: >> >> > >Does this also include making the timer for "initial_interval_secs" >> start >> > >when the task enters RUNNING? >> > >> > Did you rather mean STARTING as in AURORA-894? The >> > "initial_interval_sec" currently starts in RUNNING and AURORA-894 >> > suggests moving it into STARTING. >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Steve Niemitz >> > wrote: >> > > +100. This is particularly annoying with docker tasks, as the task >> > doesn't >> > > enter running until the pull completes. >> > > >> > > Does this also include making the timer for "initial_interval_secs" >> start >> > > when the task enters RUNNING? >> > > >> > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joseph Smith >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Also a +1, users can=E2=80=99t do anything to modify this other tha= n just >> > increase >> > >> this threshold in case we don=E2=80=99t do the right thing. >> > >> >> > >> > On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Joshua Cohen >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Zameer Manji >> > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> +1 >> > >> >> >> > >> >> I think we should be very careful in the future to ensure user >> > provided >> > >> >> timeouts do not cover state transitions outside of their control= . >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David McLaughlin < >> > david@dmclaughlin.com >> > >> > >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >>> +1 to the proposal. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Maxim Khutornenko < >> maxim@apache.org >> > > >> > >> >>> wrote: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>>> We are proposing to drop the UpdateConfig restart_threshold >> setting >> > >> >>>> due to not delivering much end user value. Please, take a >> moment to >> > >> >>>> read through https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1240 >> and >> > >> >>>> reply back if you have any doubts. >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Thanks, >> > >> >>>> Maxim >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> -- >> > >> >>> Zameer Manji >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > --001a11350fd28fa9430512da1cf2--