aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ASF IRC Bot <asf...@urd.zones.apache.org>
Subject Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora
Date Mon, 06 Apr 2015 18:27:39 GMT
Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora at Mon Apr  6 18:00:29 2015:

Attendees: thalin, wickman, wfarner, kts, mkhutornenko, serb, derfloh

- Preface
- UpdateConfig.restart_threshold deprecation
- 0.8.0 release progress
- pesos patch


IRC log follows:

## Preface ##
[Mon Apr  6 18:00:59 2015] <wfarner>: welcome to the weekly community meeting, everyone!
 the meeting is for everyone, so if you're in this channel you're welcome to participate!
[Mon Apr  6 18:01:18 2015] <wfarner>: first, roll call
[Mon Apr  6 18:01:19 2015] <wfarner>: here
[Mon Apr  6 18:01:36 2015] <thalin>: here
[Mon Apr  6 18:01:36 2015] <serb>: here
[Mon Apr  6 18:01:55 2015] <derfloh>: here
[Mon Apr  6 18:01:57 2015] <kts>: here
[Mon Apr  6 18:02:05 2015] <mkhutornenko>: here
## UpdateConfig.restart_threshold deprecation ##
[Mon Apr  6 18:03:09 2015] <kts>: +10
[Mon Apr  6 18:03:10 2015] <wfarner>: AURORA-1240
[Mon Apr  6 18:03:24 2015] <wfarner>: mkhutornenko proposed this on the mailing list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-aurora-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCAOTkfX6C2-BD%3DvN9PSNbmWntZ2CLax23PmfG8L5m75rRPOZthw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
[Mon Apr  6 18:03:42 2015] <wfarner>: we had unanimous support on the thread, and i
have proceeded with the patch
[Mon Apr  6 18:04:05 2015] <wfarner>: i suppose this is mostly a heads up at this point,
but if anyone is strongly against this, please speak up soon!
[Mon Apr  6 18:04:46 2015] <kts>: wfarner: is that linked to the wrong epic?
[Mon Apr  6 18:05:01 2015] <kts>: should be deprecated in 0.8.0 and removed in 0.9.0
- 0.7.0 is already released
[Mon Apr  6 18:05:35 2015] <wfarner>: kts: is that not how i have linked it?
[Mon Apr  6 18:05:54 2015] <kts>: AURORA-905
[Mon Apr  6 18:06:03 2015] <kts>: says, "Features that should log a warning in 0.7.x
and be removed in 0.8.0"
[Mon Apr  6 18:06:34 2015] <wfarner>: sounds like that's most easily fixed by changing
the description
[Mon Apr  6 18:07:06 2015] <wfarner>: we've kind of been making dual use of "x.x.x deprecation"
epics, newly-deprecated things and deprecated things being removed
[Mon Apr  6 18:07:17 2015] <kts>: ah, I wasn't aware of that convention
[Mon Apr  6 18:07:19 2015] <wfarner>: probably best to split those out going forward
[Mon Apr  6 18:07:24 2015] <kts>: +1
## 0.8.0 release progress ##
[Mon Apr  6 18:09:11 2015] <wfarner>: kts looks like the only remaining feature work
is testing and docs of basic auth
[Mon Apr  6 18:09:38 2015] <kts>: wfarner: I should be able to knock those out today
and tomorrow
[Mon Apr  6 18:09:45 2015] <wfarner>: great, thanks
[Mon Apr  6 18:10:32 2015] <wfarner>: that exhausts my agenda items.  floor is open
for anyone to open another topic
[Mon Apr  6 18:10:51 2015] <wickman>: what's the update on https://reviews.apache.org/r/32373/?
[Mon Apr  6 18:10:56 2015] <wickman>: (pesos)
## pesos patch ##
[Mon Apr  6 18:11:48 2015] <wfarner>: there was a relevant discussion in IRC, exploring
options for the community to back the code
[Mon Apr  6 18:12:19 2015] <wickman>: link?
[Mon Apr  6 18:12:24 2015] <wfarner>: i believe the best option was deemed to include
it in a subtree of the aurora repo.  this is still open for discussion
[Mon Apr  6 18:12:35 2015] <wfarner>: trying to find it, not the easiest to turn up
quickly...
[Mon Apr  6 18:12:50 2015] <wickman>: why vendor it?
[Mon Apr  6 18:12:57 2015] <wickman>: (if you remember the context of the discussion.)
[Mon Apr  6 18:13:25 2015] <wfarner>: http://wilderness.apache.org/channels/?f=aurora/2015-04-02
[Mon Apr  6 18:14:07 2015] <wfarner>: this is probably worth continuing after the meeting,
either here or (better yet) on the mailing list
[Mon Apr  6 18:14:23 2015] <wfarner>: sound good?
[Mon Apr  6 18:14:53 2015] <wickman>: that's reasonable. just don't want to be left
in limbo and out of the loop.
[Mon Apr  6 18:15:35 2015] <wfarner>: yup, that's why i think a ML discussion is best.
 the linked discussion was exploring options, and not a drawn conclusion
[Mon Apr  6 18:16:03 2015] <wfarner>: any other topics?
[Mon Apr  6 18:17:22 2015] <kts>: for folks that are just tuning in - the linked discussion
is about the feasability of bringing in pesos, compactor, pystachio, etc. as first-class aurora
subprojects, and the best way to go about doing it
[Mon Apr  6 18:18:02 2015] <wickman>: who is going to take the lead on a ML discussion?
[Mon Apr  6 18:19:03 2015] <wfarner>: wickman: you seem to be the most suitable candidate
[Mon Apr  6 18:19:46 2015] <wickman>: i don't really have the context though -- all
i want to do is submit the patch.
[Mon Apr  6 18:20:55 2015] <wfarner>: the context is that we want to make it possible
for a community to back these components, as they represent a significant part of the project
[Mon Apr  6 18:21:38 2015] <wickman>: ok -- but should that be a blocker for the patch?
 (i'm fine if you say yes, i just want to know that's the reason we're sitting on it.)
[Mon Apr  6 18:22:56 2015] <wfarner>: for me, it is
[Mon Apr  6 18:23:07 2015] <wickman>: ok.
[Mon Apr  6 18:23:12 2015] <wfarner>: mostly because i think it's very likely to be
on the back burner if we defer
[Mon Apr  6 18:23:42 2015] <wfarner>: but i'd love to know how others feel
[Mon Apr  6 18:24:28 2015] <wickman>: can take it to the list.  that's it for me.
[Mon Apr  6 18:24:55 2015] <kts>: i feel similarly - this is an issue we should address
before we merge the patch (to avoid creating a code silo for a particularly big portion of
the project)
[Mon Apr  6 18:26:17 2015] <wfarner>: any other topics before we close?
[Mon Apr  6 18:27:29 2015] <wfarner>: thanks, everyone!
[Mon Apr  6 18:27:31 2015] <wfarner>: ASFBot: meeting stop


Meeting ended at Mon Apr  6 18:27:31 2015

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message