Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16DDB17426 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70912 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2015 20:26:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 70865 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2015 20:26:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aurora.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 70769 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2015 20:26:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:26:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:26:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 70651 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2015 20:26:22 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:26:22 +0000 Received: from mail-qg0-f42.google.com (mail-qg0-f42.google.com [209.85.192.42]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id DAFDD1A046D for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 20:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qgep97 with SMTP id p97so144150877qge.1 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:26:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYx5uzK1HoIKCHb1d+oQNMCjN0qQvv2c5LfBfu+3EJA40EbrroliEC4Qtchl8X+cLJ038F MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.16.88 with SMTP id a85mr5785455qkh.86.1427487980666; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.64.131 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:26:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:26:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (AURORA-1212) Allow non-dedicated jobs to have static ports From: Bill Farner To: "dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org" Cc: "issues@aurora.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114724ac02785d05124af294 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a114724ac02785d05124af294 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 My apologies for the delay, I have been out of town this week and otherwise occupied by quarter boundary work. I would like to better understand your use case and the technical barriers before we proceed. I will email you to arrange that discussion. In the meantime, you might consider running a custom build with your patch. Another option is announcing in the application layer. This would give you more control over the contents of the znodes without leaning on Aurora to allow use of static ports. Ultimately my hesitance is about providing good guidance to users, and I wish to advise against use of static ports as it will not scale. Additionally, as Aurora and mesos continue to mature, I want to make sure we do not backpedal on use cases we previously condoned through accepted patches. I hope to get you unblocked soon in some way. I trust you understand that It's important to me that I fully understand use cases so that I can defend them in the future as the system evolves. On Thursday, March 26, 2015, Brian Brazil (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14382153#comment-14382153 > ] > > Brian Brazil commented on AURORA-1212: > -------------------------------------- > > I'd appreciate if my change could be reviewed, as this is blocking us from > using Aurora in production and the various alternatives suggested don't > help for our particular situation. > > > Allow non-dedicated jobs to have static ports > > --------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: AURORA-1212 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1212 > > Project: Aurora > > Issue Type: Story > > Reporter: Brian Brazil > > > > In my environment I'd like to have static ports for some jobs to > integrate with some services that don't do service discovery, but I don't > want to have to partition my users up onto dedicated machines just for this. > > Currently the aurora client rejects such a configuration, it should be > allowed. > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-aurora/commit/bcabfce60d568d5d98c72109ee4493bce773a426 > was where this restriction was added. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332) > -- -=Bill --001a114724ac02785d05124af294--