Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 956AA10838 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86587 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2015 03:27:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 86522 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2015 03:27:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86508 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2015 03:27:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:27:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:27:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 86439 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2015 03:27:25 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:27:25 +0000 Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 58AD41A0320 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 03:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c9so899528qcz.6 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:27:23 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlt/Z7QYuhtjrNO+Yy/0d9keUQQcG9djU5+DOQIzQsMWpRP4I7hOE5Iu4EQ942UY9AQnUCH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.54.205 with SMTP id r13mr61115229qag.12.1423625243962; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.139.195 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:27:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:27:23 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Seeking volunteers to create scheduler REST API RFC From: Bill Farner To: "dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e014933e8f5ce4c050ec79408 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e014933e8f5ce4c050ec79408 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Fantastic, thanks! On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Henry Saputra wrote: > BIll, > > I helped built Telemetry RESTful APIs before so I could help. > > Count me in please. > > - Henry > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Bill Farner > wrote: > > Reviving this thread. I would love to see a non-Twitter employee > > collaborate on this for a more diverse panel. > > > > -=Bill > > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Joe Stein > wrote: > > > >> Chris, > >> > >> We are primarily hoping to integrate Apache Storm. > >> > >> It is important for us that the task preemption and quotas and all that > >> great stuff is available from Aurora with the other frameworks we work > >> with. > >> > >> ~ Joe Stein > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Chris Lambert < > >> clambert@twitter.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> > Just curious, what kind of frameworks do you want to run on Aurora? > >> > > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Joe Stein > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hey, this looks really interesting. We have been toying with "how > do we > >> > run > >> > > frameworks on aurora" and I think that is a good use case for this > >> also. > >> > > > >> > > Can the pieces be broken up across a few different folks? > >> > > > >> > > Can we preserve the thrift objects and have that also as an option > >> (along > >> > > with json at least) to go over a http 2.0 end point? > >> > > > >> > > ~ Joestein > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Brian Wickman > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Joshua Cohen < > >> jcohen@twopensource.com > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > I'd love to help out with this as well. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Bill Farner > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi folks, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Before embarking on work [1] to build a REST* API for the > >> > scheduler, > >> > > > it's > >> > > > > > important that we come up with a sound design. Following up > from > >> > > > today's > >> > > > > > IRC meeting, i would like to gather a small contingent (<=4 > >> people) > >> > > to > >> > > > > > collaborate on an RFC to drive a broader design discussion. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Note that the RFC will be published to this mailing list, > where > >> it > >> > > will > >> > > > > be > >> > > > > > completely open for discussion to change (it's a Request For > >> > > Comments, > >> > > > > > after all). > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Volunteers must be willing to research the landscape for > patterns > >> > and > >> > > > > best > >> > > > > > practices in designing web application APIs; prior experience > in > >> > this > >> > > > > area > >> > > > > > is a plus. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Several people volunteered in the IRC meeting, but to keep the > >> > > > canonical > >> > > > > > discussion in one place i ask those still interested to > volunteer > >> > > again > >> > > > > on > >> > > > > > this thread. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'll start by volunteering myself. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -=Bill > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > * Used as shorthand, whether it turns out to be REST, > JSON-RPC, > >> > > > HATEOAS, > >> > > > > > etc. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-987 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > -- -=Bill --089e014933e8f5ce4c050ec79408--