Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93248975D for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:16:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93500 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 20:16:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aurora-dev-archive@aurora.apache.org Received: (qmail 93467 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 20:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93429 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2014 20:16:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1997.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,HTML_MESSAGE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.3] (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:16:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 85371 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2014 20:16:07 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:16:07 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 3A0D41A0019 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 20:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r20so8179990wiv.4 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:16:05 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlmqbjh7iBG8g99CFG7SRxL2g7nVE1lQxGmsHJ0wMkn3T30LbAFFgByxdAI4dFFxXofqf9X MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.182.226 with SMTP id eh2mr19319991wic.9.1418069765404; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:16:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.81.5 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:16:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:16:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 0.7.0 Release Manager From: Bill Farner To: "dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e016347f0a2558a0509ba183e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e016347f0a2558a0509ba183e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 FWIW the burden in being release manager is more of organization and learning the release protocols than anything else. The technical technical requirements are not significant. -=Bill On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Zameer Manji wrote: > We need a release manager for 0.7.0. Ideally we select one now so they can > prevent a very long release cycle. They should be empowered to cut features > from the release and move it along at a reasonable rate. > > On IRC Kevin and Bill mentioned they would like to see another committer > take on the release process to spread knowledge about the release process > around. > > Do we have any takers? > -- > Zameer Manji > --089e016347f0a2558a0509ba183e--