aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dave Lester" <d...@davelester.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Features for 0.7.0
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:52:40 GMT

For some reason I can see Dobromir's message in the markmail archive ([ http://markmail.org/message/6v54d3lc5qwerzq5
]( http://markmail.org/message/6v54d3lc5qwerzq5 )), but never received the message to my personal
email account. He wrote:
 
"We have someone working on integrating Docker support into Aurora; it seems fairly minor
and would be neat to get into the 0.7.0 release..."
 
IMHO, Docker support in Aurora would be a large driver for adoption. Should there be a good
patch, it'd be nice to get a release sooner than mid-Q1 which seems a ways off. Maybe we can
up the release cadence a bit more to make this possible.

 
Dave
 
-----Original Message-----
From: "Bill Farner" <wfarner@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:13pm
To: "dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org" <dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Features for 0.7.0



If you think AURORA-915 can be completed by the end of January, i don't see
any reason to keep it out.

-=Bill

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Brian Wickman <wickman@apache.org> wrote:

> In the deprecated behavior category, I'd like to get feedback on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-915 as possible candidate for
> inclusion to 0.7.0 (at the very least, warn-on-import and providing a
> binding helper for os.environ.)
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Bill Farner <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > It is not yet tracked in our end - we have yet to think about what mesos'
> > presistent resources look like under Aurora. Given the timeframe we're
> > shooting for with 0.7.0, it's unlikely MESOS-1554 will be committed and
> > released by the time we cut 0.7.0.
> >
> > -=Bill
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Joe Stein <joe.stein@stealth.ly> wrote:
> >
> > > It might be minor, already tracked or maybe nothing todo but support
> for
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1554 would be awesome :) (
> > > once
> > > released ) without forcing dedicated service.
> > >
> > > /*******************************************
> > > Joe Stein
> > > Founder, Principal Consultant
> > > Big Data Open Source Security LLC
> > > http://www.stealth.ly
> > > Twitter: @allthingshadoop
> > > ********************************************/
> > > On Dec 1, 2014 4:17 PM, "Bill Farner" <wfarner@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now that 0.6.0 is buttoned up, it's time to think about what we would
> > > like
> > > > to shoot for in 0.7.0 [1]!
> > > >
> > > > Framing the discussion - i'd like to suggest we keep 0.7.0 a 'minor'
> > > > release to allow us to wrap it up by mid Q1. So while lofty goals
> are
> > > more
> > > > than welcome in JIRA, let's be somewhat resistant to them in the
> > upcoming
> > > > release.
> > > >
> > > > To summarize what's currently on the docket, we have:
> > > > - removal of several minor deprecated behaviors [2]
> > > > - begin phasing out the 'v1' client
> > > > - promote server-side updates, phase out client-side job update
> > behavior
> > > >
> > > > With that in mind, what else would you all (non-committers welcome)
> > like
> > > to
> > > > see in 0.7.0?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-872
> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-423
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -=Bill
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message