Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jcohen@twopensource.com
 designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOOJoEy2kh3yWGttF6Lq4Psa7kdXMehBo0GLsapqyoF48XLm2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAOTkfX7x2oipk4ZFysoS0uWZRizOnKJA3y15pvEW5K4YnUHw-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOOJoEy2kh3yWGttF6Lq4Psa7kdXMehBo0GLsapqyoF48XLm2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:43:02 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAMnduq_L+K7LOV4GkW0de2OgH1FFW5BGo+qbMRwgAFtqcxP=-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: External Update Coordination
From: Joshua Cohen <jcohen@twopensource.com>
To: "dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org" <dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1e2d267c8ec0505179818

--001a11c1e2d267c8ec0505179818
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

In theory when the user resumes they'd also resume monitoring (and thus
resume heartbeats)? Maybe the resumeJobUpdate RPC needs to support
pauseIfNoHeartbeatsAfterMs as well?

I'm not sure what a monitoring/heartbeating service would do with its
record of a paused job while it's paused. How would it know when to resume
monitoring and sending heartbeats without some notification that the update
itself has resumed? By the same token, if monitoring were to continue while
an updated was paused and an alert were to fire, what action would the
monitoring service take with regard to the paused update?

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:28 PM, David McLaughlin <david@dmclaughlin.com>
wrote:

>    - A heartbeatJobUpdate RPC is called with the matching update ID.
>    Scheduler resets countdown and responds with STOP
>
> Paused is a tricky state because the user can resume at any time. I'd
> propose we have a different response here. You really don't want to "stop"
> monitoring the update while it is in a non-terminal state. You might want
> to be aware that your heartbeat is a no-op, though.
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Maxim Khutornenko <maxim@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We are proposing a new feature for the scheduler updater, which you
> > may find helpful.
> >
> > I have posed a brief feature summary here:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/maxim111333/incubator-aurora/blob/hb_doc/docs/update-heartbeat.md
> >
> > Please, reply with your feedback/concerns/comments.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Maxim
> >
>

--001a11c1e2d267c8ec0505179818--