aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Sirois <john.sir...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: pants_support_baseurls
Date Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:23:40 GMT
The bintray is public as well and built to serve binaries.  I'd definitely
switch - no backup.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Smith <yasumoto7@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the insight! This is going to be for the external Apache
> codebase, so we're okay with using
> https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support if you're also using
> it as a fallback.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Eric Ayers <zundel@squareup.com> wrote:
>
>> At Square we have some binaries that we override, so we have an internal
>> site for those, and then we fall back to this URL for others.
>>
>> pants_support_baseurls = [
>>     'https://our-internal-machine/test-build-support',
>>     'https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support',
>>   ]
>>
>> We have a comment to find a better solution. I’m not sure keeping
>> binaries in github is a great long term thing because I’m not sure it could
>> handle a lot of traffic.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Smith <yasumoto7@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Aurora ran into an issue where it could not build on OS X 10.10
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-867>, and we didn't get
>>> much clarity on the filed issue on github
>>> <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/690>.
>>>
>>> I've sent out a review for Aurora <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27066/>
>>> to use https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support- does that
>>> sound reasonable? If that's going to be ~stable for the foreseeable future
>>> then that'd be awesome, but I don't want to force a public artifact store
>>> on you guys if that's not its purpose.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Joe
>>>
>> ​
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message