aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Smith <yasumo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: pants_support_baseurls
Date Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:21:37 GMT
Thanks for the insight! This is going to be for the external Apache
codebase, so we're okay with using
https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support if you're also using it
as a fallback.

Thanks!

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Eric Ayers <zundel@squareup.com> wrote:

> At Square we have some binaries that we override, so we have an internal
> site for those, and then we fall back to this URL for others.
>
> pants_support_baseurls = [
>     'https://our-internal-machine/test-build-support',
>     'https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support',
>   ]
>
> We have a comment to find a better solution. I’m not sure keeping binaries
> in github is a great long term thing because I’m not sure it could handle a
> lot of traffic.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Smith <yasumoto7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> Aurora ran into an issue where it could not build on OS X 10.10
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-867>, and we didn't get
>> much clarity on the filed issue on github
>> <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/690>.
>>
>> I've sent out a review for Aurora <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27066/>
>> to use https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support- does that
>> sound reasonable? If that's going to be ~stable for the foreseeable future
>> then that'd be awesome, but I don't want to force a public artifact store
>> on you guys if that's not its purpose.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Joe
>>
> ​
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message