aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bhuvan Arumugam <>
Subject Re: Python versions (redux)
Date Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:11:09 GMT
Only reason I could think of supporting py26 is to support rhel6.x
customers. Now that rhel7 is out [1], it make sense to discontinue
support for py26. We should document it in supported platforms though.
We should add a pointer for rhel6.x customers to upgrade python.

It also make sense as py26 is already eol [2].

That said, +1 to discontinue support for py26.


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Mark Chu-Carroll
<> wrote:
> A couple of months ago, we had a discussion about which python versions to
> support. (See
> to refresh your memory.)
> At the time, we punted on it, because we had a convenient workaround. But
> python version issues have continued to pop up from time to time. In
> particular, we've had issues like the current
> The question that I'd like to put forward is: how much effort is it work to
> continue to support Python 2.6? The Python maintainers are no longer
> maintaining 2.6 - the download page for the last release of 2.6 says:
>  "With the 2.6.9 release, and five years after its first release, the
> Python 2.6 series is now officially retired. All official maintenance for
> Python 2.6, including security patches, has ended. For ongoing maintenance
> releases, please see the Python 2.7 series. The NEWS file lists every
> change in each alpha, beta, release candidate, and final release of Python
> 2.6."
> We certainly *can* continue to support Python2.6, but it's likely to be a
> non-trivial effort. Is it worth it?
> (Full disclosure, in case it's not obvious: I think as a provider of a
> distributed computing platform, continuing to support a python interpreter
> that won't even get security fixes is not a good idea. I'm in favor of
> dropping 2.6.)
>      -Mark

Bhuvan Arumugam

View raw message