aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Farner <>
Subject Re: Desired output for AURORA-511
Date Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:44:37 GMT
Sorry for the radio silence on this, Jeff!  I'm just returning from
vacation, and the team has been swamped.  Please don't take this an
indication that we're not interested in your contribution!

I'm actually not sure what exactly Kevin had in mind with AURORA-511, so
i've requested that he give more details on the ticket.  In the meantime,
i'd be more than happy to suggest some more fully-described tickets if
you're still interested.

On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Jeffrey N. Davis <>

> Howdy all -
> I'm looking to help and thought AURORA-511 - Utilization Servlet should
> return JSON instead of HTML - would be a good place to jump off from.
>  After looking through the servlet and the various display classes, I've
> got two questions -
> 1.)  You want to yank the current HTML output and replace it w/ JSON, not
> mimic the existing behavior shown by the /vars and /vars.json endpoints
> correct?
> 2.)  The current output is very "human readable", i.e. -> "2 GB".  Do
> y'all want to continue using a "very very" human readable format?  Drop it
> down to something like a du -h output, i.e. -> 2g or 2m or 2k?  Or do we
> want to drop it down to integers with an assumed format, or possibly
> provided format in the json output, i.e. -> units: MB, RAM:  2048.
> I understand these are basic questions, but I wanted to ensure I was
> working on what the core team was expecting.
> Reference:
> Thanks,
> Jeff Davis

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message