aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Chu-Carroll <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.5.0 (incubating) RC0
Date Tue, 06 May 2014 15:41:35 GMT
Grabbing the RC, downloading it, running vagrant up, and then trying to
just run the end to end test fails, because the aurora client isn't found
in the vagrant image:

+ vagrant ssh devcluster -c 'aurora killall
bash: line 2: aurora: command not found

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Justin Mclean <>wrote:

> Hi,
> As an IPMC/previous shepherd thought I give my feedback.
> Signatures and hashes all good
> DISCLAIMER correct
> Filename contains "incubating"
> NOTICE and LICENCE good (checked all 3rd party bit of code and they all
> seem to be there)
> Not all files have correct headers - may or may not be OK
> There's a few binaries in the release
> Can compile from source
> Test pass
> From a quick look there are python, CSS, JS, JSON and HMTL template (tpl)
> files that are misisng headers. Some are 3rd party so may not be an issue
> but the ones in src/main/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler may be?
> Given the large number of files (207) it's a little hard to easily review
> this. Has rat been run on the release?
> Binary files in release - some of these may be OK
> /3rdparty/javascript/bower_components/angular/angular.min.js.gzip
> /gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar
> /src/test/resources/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/app/AuroraTestKeyStore
> /src/resources/org/apache/thermos/root/checkpoints/failure/coordinator.*
> Re the gradle wrapper I was able to use gradle to compile without it so it
> may not actually be required in the source release?
> As it was not mentioned directly in the README etc I was unaware that you
> should use gradlew command instead. I saw later that it is mentioned in
> docs/
> A few (very) minor things:
> - Release file doesn't have apache in it's name, while not required it may
> give extra legal protection [1]
> - KEYS are usually outside release package
> - Not sure if this is possible, as i'm not familiar with gradle,  but you
> may want to consider a source and binary release with the binary having the
> gradle jar?
> - BUILD is usually named BUILDING or the build information put in README.
> - I notice the .asc file has .md5 and .sha hashes of it in the RC
> directory. There are probably not required.
> I'm sure you know your own project better that me, so if I've mentioned
> something that already been discussed or I've misunderstood something I
> apologise in advance. The fact I was able to take the source package and
> compile it will minimal effort certainly indicates to me that it's release
> ready.
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 1.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message