aurora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Lambert <clamb...@twitter.com>
Subject Re: Possible Vagrant configuration change
Date Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:20:15 GMT
Seems more realistic.  +1

Is there any documentation that might depend on this?



On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Mark Chu-Carroll <mchucarroll@apache.org>wrote:

> Folks:
>
> I've been working on getting together an and-to-end test for open-source
> Aurora. In order to get it working with a realistic scenario including
> multiple task instances, I've modified the vagrant configuration to launch
> to mesos slaves, each of which believes that it has 4cpus to allocate. I'd
> like to make this two-slave setup the default vagrant configuration.
>
> On my work laptop (Macbook Pro, 4 cores, 8GB memory), it's
> indistinguishable from running with just one slave - there's no visible
> impact on the performance of other tasks, and running little benchmarks on
> my laptop show no statistically meaningful variation between the 1 and 2
> slave configs when no tasks are running on the slaves.  I suspect that with
> less memory, there would be more performance impact, but I can't measure
> that.
>
> Does anyone object to this change?  (If so, I'll put this as a new
> Vagrantfile in the directory containing the end-to-end tests. But I'd
> really prefer to have a single canonical vagrant test/demonstration
> configuration.)
>
> Thanks,
>
>         -Mark
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message