Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aurora.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wickman@twitter.com designates
 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJ7Dzv2KcSxygSoBrrdoZ2fd2ZN5xNvhcnQw5CzcNn6MwCOESA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAATh-ZdLRb3XVkWpC3hOrc8BGRSrgtNohca7CO5ZHZdLYPx5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ7Dzv2KcSxygSoBrrdoZ2fd2ZN5xNvhcnQw5CzcNn6MwCOESA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:27:00 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAE9BBBax1XNTM2wUgN+a2EL0qcvL9Gy+Ziw2C7XA4ysQuNuyCg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tagging process
From: Brian Wickman <wickman@twitter.com>
To: Bill Farner <bill@twitter.com>
Cc: Kevin Sweeney <kevints@apache.org>,
 Maxim Khutornenko <mkhutornenko@twitter.com>,
	Aurora <dev@aurora.incubator.apache.org>, Ben Hindman <benh@twitter.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3a8cc4832c804ed7550cb

--001a11c3a8cc4832c804ed7550cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1


On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Bill Farner <bill@twitter.com> wrote:

> This sounds good to me.
>
> -=Bill
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Kevin Sweeney <kevints@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I think figuring out the tagging process sooner than later is in
>> everyone's best interest so that we can get out of cherry-pick limbo. I'm
>> out next week, but if anyone wants to take a stab at it (using
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16265/ as a starting point or just throw it
>> away, please feel free). My thinking:
>>
>> .auroraversion on master only ever contains -SNAPSHOT versions. This
>> makes it harder for someone to reset and accidentally creating bogus
>> non-SNAPSHOT artifacts.
>>
>> At each tag there are 2 commits. One on an anonymous branch that does
>> s/-SNAPSHOT// and one on master that increments the MINOR portion of the
>> version. So if master is 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT this new branch will have 0.2.0.
>> For that commit we create an annotated (preferably PGP-signed) tag, 0.2.0.
>> The other commit on master changes .auroraversion to 0.3.0-SNAPSHOT.
>>
>> Once everything is verified we'll push 2 things - the new master and the
>> tag (so origin will not have a name for the branch the tag was created on).
>>
>> What does everyone think of this process?
>>  --
>> Kevin Sweeney
>> @kts
>>
>
>

--001a11c3a8cc4832c804ed7550cb--