atlas-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Radley (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-1254) Ability to add relationships to a term
Date Wed, 14 Dec 2016 10:15:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15747915#comment-15747915
] 

David Radley commented on ATLAS-1254:
-------------------------------------

I am thinking that in addition to the optional owning glossary category. A term could have
different types of  associated relationships, which could be
1) has a 
2) antonym
3) homonym
4) replaces / replaced by. So the glossary can contain replacement knowledge explicitly rather
than in rename history.  
5) relationship to 0 or more other glossary categories
6) a verb relationship . for example to be able to hold the information behind a statement
like ' The customer  C owns account A.'      
 

> Ability to add relationships to a term
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ATLAS-1254
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-1254
>             Project: Atlas
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: David Radley
>            Assignee: David Radley
>
> Ability to add has relationships to a term. I suggest that to do this consistently ,
terms should be implemented as entities - thereby picking up the ability to have attributes,
relationships (including has)  and guids (non-name) identity. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message