Mailing-List: contact users-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5668C075.3040203@ics.uci.edu>
References: <D28DBE75.225C%Namrata.Malarout@jpl.nasa.gov>
 <CAE1xAnu8ve689nX-3xHBNmyWaxV1_7MDfevvZ+q8boV0TY9XcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN_YF5ymYyjhW0xkZ6XdMTy=6ebY6GjCZNV8TWFOO8-e2b1dUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <D28DE749.226B%Namrata.Malarout@jpl.nasa.gov> <5668C075.3040203@ics.uci.edu>
From: Ian Maxon <imaxon@uci.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:23:06 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAN_YF5z0ZeD9N_GqdAJra=htmBGjEc2KOTmSoJqN+kof7FPmPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Few questions about AsterixDB
To: users@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would go with either 0.8.7-incubating or the latest revision from
the (to-be) release candidate branch (release-0.8.8) that is basically
just bugfixes
from 0.8.7-incubating.

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Michael Carey <mjcarey@ics.uci.edu> wrote:
> Actually, you should change the version you are RUNNING.  :-)
> The slides would just be a reflection of that.  (The version that
> you're running is older and buggier than the current version.)
> @Ian, which version (number) would be most recommended?
>
> On 12/9/15 2:14 PM, Malarout, Namrata (398M-Affiliate) wrote:
>
> Ian and Mike,
> Thanks for your answers.
> Mike, during our meeting last week you said we should change the version
> written on the slides. What should I change it to?
> -Namrata
>
> On 12/9/15, 1:19 PM, "Ian Maxon" <imaxon@uci.edu> wrote:
>
> For 1 (parallelization bottlenecks), one would be the fact the
> CC(Master node) is the only place where queries are compiled right
> now. This will most likely change at some point but that's how it is
> today.
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Steven Jacobs <sjaco002@ucr.edu> wrote:
>
> I think I am the person to answer 4:
> This is the focus of my research. The long-term answer is yes. The
> short-term answer is, it depends on what sort of tasks you are trying to
> perform. Can you be more specific?
> Steven
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Malarout, Namrata (398M-Affiliate)
> <Namrata.Malarout@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I had for a few question specific to AsterixDB for a Data Container
> Study
> I am working on. I can=C2=B9t really address these as I have not explored
> them
> yet.
> The questions are:
>
>   1.  What, if any, are the parallelization bottlenecks?
>   2.  Does AsterixDB support Anomaly Detection, Clustering or Graph
> Traversal?
>   3.  Can we find largest connecting components in graph?
>   4.  Is automation possible for repetitive tasks?
>
> If anyone has worked with use cases which use any of the above
> concepts or
> have knowledge about these and could help answer them, it would be
> great.
> Thanks in advance,
> Namrata
>
>