Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-asterixdb-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F6D218D6D for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28483 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2016 22:22:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-notifications-archive@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 28445 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2016 22:22:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28436 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2016 22:22:16 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C1D47C0257 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.221 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.221 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ci9Z3ULYUrfz for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 078195F298 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28247 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2016 22:22:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:13 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CBE2C1F60 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 22:22:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chris Hillery (JIRA)" To: notifications@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (ASTERIXDB-1420) Explicit 127.0.0.1 reference are probably a bad idea MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Hillery reassigned ASTERIXDB-1420: ---------------------------------------- Assignee: Chris Hillery > Explicit 127.0.0.1 reference are probably a bad idea > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ASTERIXDB-1420 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1420 > Project: Apache AsterixDB > Issue Type: Bug > Components: AsterixDB > Reporter: Chris Hillery > Assignee: Chris Hillery > Priority: Minor > > There are a number of places throughout the code which reference "127.0.0.1" explicitly. These will break in a machine with only IPv6. While this is unlikely anytime soon, it would probably make sense to replace these references with InetAddress.getLoopbackAddress().getHostAddress() . -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)