Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org;
 run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Michael J. Carey (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: notifications@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12895618.1442962355000.69408.1443150784557@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12895618.1442962355000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12895618.1442962355000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12895618.1442962355278@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ASTERIXDB-1109) Index entries are not deleted
 on an open-type secondary index
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14907485#comment-14907485 ] 

Michael J. Carey commented on ASTERIXDB-1109:
---------------------------------------------

Nice!


> Index entries are not deleted on an open-type secondary index
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERIXDB-1109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1109
>             Project: Apache AsterixDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Taewoo Kim
>            Assignee: Taewoo Kim
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Currently, index entries (SK, PK) are not deleted on an open-type secondary index. This issue was not surfaced due to the fact that every search after a secondary index search needs to go through the primary index lookup. Therefore, un-deleted entries were removed during this Pidx lookup.
> Now, we have an index-only plan that can skip the Pidx lookup after a Sidx search. Therefore, the query result is not correct anymore.
>   


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)