asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Jacobs <sjaco...@ucr.edu>
Subject Re: Modules that could be removed?
Date Thu, 01 Jun 2017 05:20:18 GMT
My two cents on this is that the BAD model doesn't work well, so I'd
personally be against following it. I would vote to keep it inside as well.
Steven

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:02 PM abdullah alamoudi <bamousaa@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If that is the case (which makes sense), then keeping it inside and
> cleaning it up might be the better approach.
>
>
> > On May 31, 2017, at 8:45 PM, Ildar Absalyamov <
> ildar.absalyamov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The real challenge is that separate repo should not the treated as
> /dev/null for old code.
> > I believe that committing changes, that causes this repo to be broken
> *must* be treated as -1 Jenkins bit.
> >
> >> On May 31, 2017, at 16:41, Yingyi Bu <buyingyi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Yingyi
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I read this discussion that Ildar’s suggestion to move
> asterix-experiments
> >>> to a different repo would be a solution that works for everybody.
> >>>
> >>> Did I read that correctly or did someone disagree with such an
> approach?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Till
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 31 May 2017, at 16:14, Mike Carey wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This should be decided by more knowlegeable folks than me - it just
> seems
> >>>> "weird" to me that that's in the main code base and not outside (as
a
> super
> >>>> useful client package).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/31/17 4:12 PM, Chris Hillery wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> If we move asterix-experiments out, we would need to change the
> current
> >>>>> Perf job at Couchbase. However I think the change would actually
make
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> job less complicated, at least if that allowed one to use a
> pre-compiled
> >>>>> Asterix distribution for experiments rather than requiring the full
> >>>>> source
> >>>>> code to be available.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ceej
> >>>>> aka Chris Hillery
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Yingyi Bu <buyingyi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The code in asterix-experiments is not well organized, e.g.:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/tree/master/asterixdb/
> >>>>>>
> asterix-experiments/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/experiment/builder
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/tree/master/asterixdb/
> >>>>>>
> asterix-experiments/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/experiment/report
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can anyone who actively uses asterix-experiments clean up the
code?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> An alternative approach would be to put it in a separate github
> repo,
> >>>>>> if
> >>>>>> it is relatively independent of AsterixDB.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Yingyi
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Ian Maxon <imaxon@uci.edu>
wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I also would vouch for keeping asterix-experiments in.
> 'asterix-tools'
> >>>>>>> and the others could probably go.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Taewoo Kim <wangsaeu@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> @Ildar: +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Taewoo
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Ildar Absalyamov <
> >>>>>>>> ildar.absalyamov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I found Young-Seok’s asterix-experiment package useful
for
> everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> is doing any kind of experiments.
> >>>>>>>>> Can we instead make an ‘asterix-contrib’ repo
and move it there,
> the
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> same
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> way we did with asterix-bad?
> >>>>>>>>> We can also launch an automated build in Jenkins
to verify it
> builds
> >>>>>>>>> against master, again the same way BAD is working.
This package
> does
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> have a lot of dependencies, so it will be fairly painless
to
> maintain
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On May 31, 2017, at 09:06, Yingyi Bu <buyingyi@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi dev,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>   I wonder if the following potentially obsolete
modules could
> be
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> moved
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> out of the AsterixDB code base:
> >>>>>>>>>>   -- asterix-experiment
> >>>>>>>>>>   -- asterix-tools
> >>>>>>>>>>   -- hyracks-dist
> >>>>>>>>>>   -- hyracks-sever
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>   Any thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>> Yingyi
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Ildar
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ildar
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message