asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ildar Absalyamov <ildar.absalya...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: When is it appropirate to add reserved words to the AQL/SQL++ Grammar?
Date Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:46:16 GMT
Ian,

There is an existing API, which does exactly that. https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/blob/master/asterixdb/asterix-app/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/api/http/server/ConnectorApiServlet.java#L123
<https://github.com/apache/asterixdb/blob/master/asterixdb/asterix-app/src/main/java/org/apache/asterix/api/http/server/ConnectorApiServlet.java#L123>
I have been successfully using it in my experiments.

> On Apr 12, 2017, at 13:41, Ian Maxon <imaxon@uci.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hey all,
> I was working on a patch that would add a 'flush dataset' DDL command
> (mainly for testing), and of course this would require adding 'flush'
> as a new reserved word. What is the consensus on when this would be
> permitted at this point? There are other ways to do this, of course, I
> could expose this functionality through a separate API, and I am not
> really partial to one solution or the other.
> 
> Thanks,
> - Ian

Best regards,
Ildar


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message