asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jianfeng Jia <>
Subject Re: Choosing defaults for AsterixDB
Date Sat, 04 Feb 2017 02:34:45 GMT
@Yingyi, I’m not saying learning SQL++ is difficult. 
Currently, we have a class called AQLGenerator that can translate the Cloudberry request syntax
to AQL.  It took us several weeks finishing it.
I guess it will take similar time to write a SQLPPGenerator to achieve the same goal. 

As long as the RESTFul API can accept AQL, we don’t need to spend time to implement a new

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Yingyi Bu <> wrote:
>>> It will be a hard work to switch to SQL++.
> Why translating to SQL++ is harder than AQL?  I wonder if the current SQL++
> language design and implementation misses some key pieces.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message