Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780F7200BE2 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:11:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 75028160B15; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BC2B1160B13 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:11:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 10196 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2016 18:11:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 10175 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2016 18:11:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:11:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D19A5C01DD for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:11:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.88 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlNqX_fppRwA for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (mail-oi0-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id AC82C60D9B for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b126so55641562oia.2 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:11:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BtQUQT/PmRKKc6F0yy9h3bwF1wgrS910BUKQdYshf3A=; b=CGSi9KjvteOaTFsABOQxmf9f+XCSyfbCphv21eHmQ7laLd2oqXNIbr4eIBpuw0tqUg OejnpnDK3sQpo8iEUgpzmIyAcZwPshoFWJQ31JElUxmP7jpvSovv3qZZGY27jTXb9UDG rJmnhbbqGaWW7kMe6iGfyu0MkluEAh/DydVbNtM3uwl95qVkKSOdq4TVvazoxBboKx4v V8FFEJo1A2mE7EGMTrcLCx+tvmjiDi2tP2Q1/ThTIQpFPya6asEjaCg4sl63L497p0fD F58/qrqmRoHIgJdrrj448+DpvsJNqgQwrtOlIpYVWbgAMkJ5BublYcT93NkKHRJK+7oP zm8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=BtQUQT/PmRKKc6F0yy9h3bwF1wgrS910BUKQdYshf3A=; b=GOs20l7Yfm2nIgxWrwFHymjLLt9ZcaeJYizhJm01pyt0YWvvqKBq/tD+afHEcdO9aQ Mr7WVRsv6LDL7e+mkcMfpSbjljHKRd0lYd+0WWvA32/cWe4QD5xViMIwStPZA/N9G3Ox XOPomjpdxbTepY3STunjNX+twxV+g239vCxF2kmrCeVwvOjUeYYHY3nP+hFZ5PboYFUc Pl6DGAVsWlX5+qHYd/F7dg7ihn1HmO/G+L6k2IT+bJ0oABq8rZwaDEJRbDFNCJ/oAj7C +gcUntUu6w/TY9l+hwq2repYZD93WQFL6ajfsWBwPZYOOYhDZZTLrWQ82LvqSAdivVH2 UC3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJbmV5RRpKwGJOh3w1YUB78RExo44Beu6mIfUyM2yGwJuG4WmNTAKhrIlCy4CaEa7PE7RtVrJh2FLzEOQ== X-Received: by 10.157.16.70 with SMTP id o6mr1926392oto.101.1481825495505; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:11:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.23.209 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:11:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Taewoo Kim Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:11:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BAD flag on code reviews To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11413ccc4760610543b662d7 archived-at: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:11:48 -0000 --001a11413ccc4760610543b662d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 @Steven: can we check this locally before uploading a patch set? Best, Taewoo On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > As a sidenote, it doesn't block, the flag acts the same as SonarQube. If it > does break though, please do add a BAD fellow to the review so there's > visibility as to what broke and when. > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Steven Jacobs wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Those of you with reviews going on may have noticed that there is a new > > column on gerrit, called bad. This flag is because we now have an apache > > codebase for the BAD extension (You can see it here if you are > interested: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/asterixdb-bad.git) which enables > > channels and soon stored procedures. > > > > The BAD extension is dependent on the core of Asterix itself. The new > flag > > is to check whether new changes to Asterix will break the BAD extension. > In > > general most changes should be getting a +1 here. The main thing we are > > trying to avoid is a change to Asterix intended as an enhancement or > > cleanup that inadvertently removes functionality needed for Asterix > > extensions. > > > > "What should I do if I see a -1?" > > > > If you do happen to get a -1 from BAD, the easy thing to do is to add me > > (or another extension expert such as Till or Abdullah) to the code > review. > > That way I can look at the affecting part of the change and see how to > > handle it. > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. > > Thanks, > > Steven > > > --001a11413ccc4760610543b662d7--