asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Carey <dtab...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Let one Operator finished the job before another one begin in Hyracks
Date Tue, 11 Oct 2016 03:59:12 GMT
Is there a reason for wanting two jobs?  I would think that one multiple
stage job would be preferable.

On Oct 10, 2016 1:21 PM, "mingda li" <limingda1993@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, thanks Kim~
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Taewoo Kim <wangsaeu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Forwarded to dev.
> >
> > Best,
> > Taewoo
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: mingda li <limingda1993@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:21 AM
> > Subject: Let one Operator finished the job before another one begin in
> > Hyracks
> > To: users@asterixdb.apache.org
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now,I am trying to build a Bloom Filter(BF) before join. The BF is build
> in
> > each node and sent to one node to combine. I want to set a stop sign
> there
> > before sending the BF in each node. The stop sign means it can only send
> > the BF after it is build.
> > The class HyracksConnection.waitForCompletion may help this. But I am
> not
> > sure how to use it.
> > Should I build two jobs: hcc.waitForCompletion(jobBuildBF);
> > jobidSendBF=hcc.startJob(); ?
> > Has anyone ever used the HyracksConnection.waitForCompletion?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mingda
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message