Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33AA200B9B for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:08:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id F1939160AE5; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 428C4160AD2 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 02:08:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 44490 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2016 00:08:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 44474 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2016 00:08:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:08:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7DD26C0BB4 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:08:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ti0oDBWsFoPR for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f180.google.com (mail-yw0-f180.google.com [209.85.161.180]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 604165F4E5 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f180.google.com with SMTP id g192so18980445ywh.1 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:08:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=AYEG6rH0pzJSq+M/cGwptd7vt3oJJxfEk+mS7PeO/+w=; b=B/ScKg4UzwpTzRgPEUx8zRE6V3FdPm0QcQYzV5iV9su2OzmxhXEXTfswng9jP92l9H 4agpadyT5eYLryIVc5c3feKRLhNAY7oN+zYcQ8yUEd73cVaJZs8Y+hE5xtt+8zy9dMLX WLicciIoQfC38h1c2z9hfuz13hYph6RIDO8YbiNLgBEJGD9/vezACnJKgcYJ0pcCzB3e RhaJWwwXouT+7tTsZTE8gWAarbRq9rsNfD+fJVwim12G+fyOASe0DADxvVg9fmPGTuSG asduwWFSiXliGrrO/FKEYah3Cq5nIpG3Ve2+7ouQdSLN2fTnDcVAiw7DZQ/vmGkDeaY1 47cQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=AYEG6rH0pzJSq+M/cGwptd7vt3oJJxfEk+mS7PeO/+w=; b=XeUpUzyox33ZmSicH42c6jolKqi7kP4SqJNQzJq/yqifhNqOQqSclArWYUsfyJThlH XFb+D43zNifzyzLwXsuEnwIrVgPr6P7UH921phAL1H8Rdp6bkhxJ+zBUfeBvHrnl37e1 FmSH1R2Ewb0jjiUeKSTjgKwOKzjekBm6QI7BibvtdmDiEgMFqnEKVFCu6UmQWbWGzNtF GRmaT7ejJ/AwbYn6Q+i2G78o7dD6EaKW22ugQLXhy3Ujg1QtBcyl1AhReh55fMTWAdu2 hhEqzKYtkiFjEGYJbPFeFrI+jb6tKcaH3GHtNhdNsL1QWlqeTThSk3qjPvhC0ASJvC7p jMbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnffA7Oe0kje23/UTiK01JBwU1b4cxTVEQuiR3A5z6d2D3UKTDlUnOsRZjccf5R5ZIk2yYM0JGNgAr5Hw== X-Received: by 10.129.91.135 with SMTP id p129mr3344621ywb.25.1475021284032; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:08:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.3.146 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:08:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Yingyi Bu Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:08:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Physical Operator Tag Change (SPLIT -> REPLICATE) To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114c929cabc6b8053d86278a archived-at: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:08:15 -0000 --001a114c929cabc6b8053d86278a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Taewoo, I agree with you. However, can you have two separate changes: 1. Your current change https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1196/. Call your "Split" "PartitionSplit" for now. 2. Do what you proposed in the next change which only does the renaming. That makes reviews less overwhelming and easier. Best, Yingyi On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Taewoo Kim wrote: > Hello All, > > Regarding the index-only plan, I am going to introduce an operator named > SplitOperator that propagates each tuple to only one output branch. > Currently, ReplicateOperator propagates each tuple to all output branches. > And ReplicatePOperator uses the physical operator tag as SPLIT. I suggest > we change it to REPLICATE. Thus, SPLIT tag can be used for real Split > operator. Any thoughts? > > Best, > Taewoo > --001a114c929cabc6b8053d86278a--