Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABytAGqzUcqTzEF_a-peN2W6wxf3Gify7kxVPkyavKtZKHZ4xg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABytAGpR-zXfcwLQP45caGDP_x9VwvfBWXVc=rn+a21uUcTXNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALjEsF74mxa-kD2vY2B+9wtfgENJNL7ro=BS2UHtDEejavOH8g@mail.gmail.com> <CABytAGqzUcqTzEF_a-peN2W6wxf3Gify7kxVPkyavKtZKHZ4xg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yingyi Bu <buyingyi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:13:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CALjEsF431nJKNQBEL9_PsPJKXq5M5mjgKj0c-FQCJ8m=vYY8hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Physical Operator Tag Change (SPLIT -> REPLICATE)
To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c146bcc2254c9053d863bbd
archived-at: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:13:35 -0000

--94eb2c146bcc2254c9053d863bbd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

All right, that also works, thanks!

Best,
Yingyi

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Taewoo Kim <wangsaeu@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Yingyi: Thanks for the suggestion. Actually, I have crated a separate
> patch for this change only: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1219/.
> Once this is merged, the review for the second step would be much easier.
>
> Best,
> Taewoo
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Yingyi Bu <buyingyi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Taewoo,
> >
> > I agree with you.
> > However, can you have two separate changes:
> > 1. Your current change https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1196/.
> Call
> > your "Split" "PartitionSplit" for now.
> > 2. Do what you proposed in the next change which only does the renaming.
> >
> > That makes reviews less overwhelming and easier.
> >
> > Best,
> > Yingyi
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Taewoo Kim <wangsaeu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Regarding the index-only plan, I am going to introduce an operator
> named
> > > SplitOperator that propagates each tuple to only one output branch.
> > > Currently, ReplicateOperator propagates each tuple to all output
> > branches.
> > > And ReplicatePOperator uses the physical operator tag as SPLIT. I
> suggest
> > > we change it to REPLICATE. Thus, SPLIT tag can be used for real Split
> > > operator. Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Taewoo
> > >
> >
>

--94eb2c146bcc2254c9053d863bbd--