asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Taewoo Kim <wangs...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Physical Operator Tag Change (SPLIT -> REPLICATE)
Date Wed, 28 Sep 2016 06:26:53 GMT
Thanks all. Now, the change has been merged to the master. So,
ReplicatePOperator uses REPLICATE tag, instead of SPLIT tag. SPLIT tag will
be used by real split operator.


Best,
Taewoo

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Mike Carey <dtabass@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sep 27, 2016 10:11 PM, "Preston Carman" <prestonc@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I always thought it was confusing that the ReplicatePOperator used the
> > SPLIT tag. I think making the name consistent would be nice.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Yingyi Bu <buyingyi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Taewoo,
> > >
> > > I agree with you.
> > > However, can you have two separate changes:
> > > 1. Your current change https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1196/.
> > Call
> > > your "Split" "PartitionSplit" for now.
> > > 2. Do what you proposed in the next change which only does the
> renaming.
> > >
> > > That makes reviews less overwhelming and easier.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yingyi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Taewoo Kim <wangsaeu@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello All,
> > >>
> > >> Regarding the index-only plan, I am going to introduce an operator
> named
> > >> SplitOperator that propagates each tuple to only one output branch.
> > >> Currently, ReplicateOperator propagates each tuple to all output
> > branches.
> > >> And ReplicatePOperator uses the physical operator tag as SPLIT. I
> > suggest
> > >> we change it to REPLICATE. Thus, SPLIT tag can be used for real Split
> > >> operator. Any thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Taewoo
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message