Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C09200AE2 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 22:33:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5239F160A12; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C7817160A38 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 22:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 14838 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2016 20:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14825 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2016 20:33:16 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:33:16 +0000 Received: from [10.17.2.134] (unknown [206.169.106.2]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id B965C1A00C5 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:33:15 +0000 (UTC) From: "Till Westmann" To: dev@asterixdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Cross project changes Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:33:14 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <0DF78FAE-5594-44CF-98CB-F0D850504485@apache.org> <3D5BE72D-566A-452C-8A5E-78D7F4107FFD@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234) archived-at: Fri, 27 May 2016 20:33:17 -0000 This is only about notifications, there should be no limitations on being able to do anything. Do you think that the notifications would be problematic for the reviewers of your changes? Cheers, Till On 27 May 2016, at 10:35, Yingyi Bu wrote: > Can we do that after we move algebricks as a top-level module? > Many of my changes/fixes span algebricks and asterixdb. > Today we have: > -- asterixdb > -- hyracks-fullstack > > I think we should have the following structure at top level: > -- asterixdb > -- algbericks > -- hyracks > > Best, > Yingyi > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Till Westmann > wrote: > >> Any thoughts on this? Would it be difficult to add such >> notifications to >> the >> Gerrit review? >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >> >> On 23 May 2016, at 9:51, Till Westmann wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> to increase the chances that Hyracks stays generic enough for other >>> projects >>> to build upon, I think that it’d be good if we alerted committers >>> and >>> reviewers of cross project changes. >>> >>> Could we e.g. automatically flag changes that change AsterixDB and >>> Hyracks >>> with a comment on the Gerrit review? That way we'd have a reminder >>> for >>> each >>> patchset to look at the cross-project modifications. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>