Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CF8518214 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98384 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2016 19:14:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 98320 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2016 19:14:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98304 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2016 19:14:34 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:14:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D7531C0316 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:14:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52QkO0_XkCVK for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8B50C5FACD for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id p65so158838980wmp.1 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HYvh4e5U3U4Cnm+9pwHGzuZtkYGywHmtTVX3stP221g=; b=ObcCTggrT76kYmTSa9HGh7P9xD/LougWIR/sEOiMRfqkw8k3n4fh2nqPQjtM7jr6SB tedXL4GU8lh7+ihvBImcUPJgTVzcykRfZpS6MaE6knae+8x/dYpTZ89wdaECjVuEqQaF ufVPGATYjEE744nvuv5X6w//h9WrWExBNIpPrWm4KrFzqfx/A1kICVZy+tZS67xaZXnH 8Tm8Okgj0He1TPo0kiydzYoGWGtvJZvGkMrKzKEMFK97lzQ9eLglb0HUOi98o0cxTGb4 Colbp6GpEtBWScvJqm82RiG4I9Vp9pJPwEEPVC/QUAJEVic/E2jbOTHn2UNSbqzPFKpP /AxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HYvh4e5U3U4Cnm+9pwHGzuZtkYGywHmtTVX3stP221g=; b=V3+cs3RbTY1hR6wH0cCaSeKcWdkRZfiE2J+NHsJ02ZEcTPxCx1+bXz0CaEpom83ZJi cEh5CWQKnNDJPRFJQ8dfOENGNGkOZ5I1sYutlOibr9Y4hSEiLWbnaRJ1+7TFlldSWRYX jzhA4Ip5i9CO19nToVqcJzOb5m7AC6Qm3FdsMJ6aNuF5/eg3zsxjjABgBtwGkdio2WTr jk97FzN3FEYSI//HWzLrKuigRpEWmqeRjaaUbcfVqhE5Xg4IKEZp+rguJzlYcljKnlVW OUpu+JKMu+BmhNHZRUBR9Bjlw9D0h6NnKIBu8yJw/K/vWLUWlAj7rMNlZ4kyVINoSmGR 1LXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL7x1yLREUjmHRhUKsrNP/SfPCh0q5GSNBvnMNqlq2a35aMm7nF+G6rt5soPT+hNsj5r625w1fb1+kkAg== X-Received: by 10.28.113.155 with SMTP id d27mr253492wmi.67.1458069272274; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Michael Blow Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:14:22 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: standardize indentation for XML files To: "dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147cd9c082d07052e1b35e7 --001a1147cd9c082d07052e1b35e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi asterixdb dev, Currently XML files in asterixdb (including hyracks) have a wide variety of indentation schemes being used, often times within a single file, which makes maintenance quite painful. I would like to propose a convention of *two-spaces* for indentation within xml files. Personally, I believe that this convention provides the highest level of human-readability for XML files. Please let me know your thoughts / opinions. Thanks! -MDB --001a1147cd9c082d07052e1b35e7--