Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AEDD17477 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48125 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2015 04:38:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 48075 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2015 04:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 48063 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2015 04:38:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:38:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 838481A1F51 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:38:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ayg-lgi5wvl3 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E131742BA9 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lfs39 with SMTP id 39so33313987lfs.3 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:38:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qa2Q9/I9YLsayB7dBUBmSEWtcJwOQlVdXESqfghd4F4=; b=VzuSRUBss+Gvd5QBydg/1PTpOj4IhCladAlV5oU5G5mWd55dCybr3FF71rzfNE3WKT o791sBrBvZd+Fjahe2FxYPe+O63NjPscXLGDSb6BYDakMVz4TDDF/gD4fQmqC7ZrvYQA zN2Yv9DIYV2pXDs3PH9zAEo5nTDL1fw/PLPzCOMY9AuAdB1D6eT0VHBy+fd37IfZAdDu 1UG4ZhEkW2lJnTIIidyeUtex3wRBB4puafmJ3yf1JlJ/yviinx37zGXqCeNsYHtkDqEY MlV+Ai0FOZfa3EggfvfFG9kjghDF0yU0NKw2DL3m1K5NYF31oIWmMQO40TbOVpLPWTjb PRAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.31.210 with SMTP id f201mr830343lff.6.1449031097749; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:38:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.82.70 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:38:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <827B4E68-FC49-4391-A762-9A86DF0D741E@apache.org> References: <827B4E68-FC49-4391-A762-9A86DF0D741E@apache.org> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:38:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Internal documentation From: Young-Seok Kim To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11401b2ed999410525e2d780 --001a11401b2ed999410525e2d780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I spent 45 minutes to create the following book for the demo purpose: https://www.gitbook.com/book/kisskys/asterixdb-internal-development-document/details If you follow the link, you can 1. read the book online 2. download the book in pdf format 3. edit the book as well. Please have a look. Best, Young-Seok On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > A few people have already started to add design docs to our wiki [1]. > I think that that's not a bad place for such documents. > However, I'm not sure what "formal internal documentation" is. > The documents we have there so far are no necessarily formal - but very > (!) helpful. > > Cheers, > Till > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ASTERIXDB/Design+Docs > > > On Dec 1, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Chen Li wrote: > > > > Per our recent discussions, we need to improve our protocol (if any) > > to do internal documentation so that knowledge can be archived and > > accumulated. There are many possibilities. > > > > One way I used in the past is: (1) Use wiki for formal internal > > documentation; (2) Use Google Docs for interactive discussions, but > > final results should be converted into wiki pages. (3) Each wiki page > > has an author and a reviewer. > > > > Other thoughts? > > > > Chen > --001a11401b2ed999410525e2d780--