Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Replication on Asterix
To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org
References: 
 <CALgBV_fOWtywsnf3uqDqAyeMZs6RFXwcT1Ui8FHSV-nVwxm3nA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Carey <dtabass@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56386F43.6010706@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 00:24:35 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALgBV_fOWtywsnf3uqDqAyeMZs6RFXwcT1Ui8FHSV-nVwxm3nA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------000008080607040209050005"

--------------000008080607040209050005
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Currently not in plan - just looking to provide the ability for other 
nodes to take over if one node drops dead (and to do so by first 
crash-recovering the in-memory component of that node - so we don't plan 
have multiple queryable replicas - just one - we'll load balance by 
partitioning and not by replicating).

On 11/2/15 9:46 AM, Wail Alkowaileet wrote:
> Dears,
>
> I know Murtadha is working on introducing replication on Asterix. I want to
> ask if that feature will also affect the Result Distribution Framework ? in
> other words, are we going to have a replicated result-set ?
>
>


--------------000008080607040209050005--