Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EC971732F for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99044 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2015 13:00:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 98992 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2015 13:00:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98980 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2015 13:00:05 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:00:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 50B3F1A25E6 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:00:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.901 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2n90NNpFefE for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9A83142B32 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qkht68 with SMTP id t68so53506686qkh.3 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:59:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=QHgwhrFyX+yp0CoaRZytB/94Mbt8KiIvASHGzXHYzU8=; b=X0zwpeAoqvZWrkNkeOru62dvycRo+HTo/G5ClgXlcSqs5Q+Xf97ajDUPpzXXOF7PKH Uf/RAv2anhCVZc1/tFvyvs0AnK4bFirVFOd2DxuMvDYGDsS9oVRnukarGN2UaEhl2g3d za9xZIRVkd0G0yD9W304vWDPOMaVo+uoRWJ6ozyenZ0IcyZhboelUJQgZxhH2taSi0WS cgBZeaEPf1VDzQ/LslgxfUeAAt4o63Xzbn0cj1RmcwMmDD17qe+wWPfDuszKgMjT1AAB vflgaTXeTHn+8tcioURd+tLv3Vvr2bSM7IF/F3bGRIOUkxzRzTD+krA6XROSwQx+F2Rx 9nVQ== X-Received: by 10.55.22.162 with SMTP id 34mr19516005qkw.3.1445000395293; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mikejcarey.local ([179.218.40.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p88sm7674489qkl.34.2015.10.16.05.59.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:59:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: formating XML To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org References: From: Mike Carey Message-ID: <5620F4C6.7090909@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:59:50 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030502070807040205000006" --------------030502070807040205000006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Agreed. (One could make the same argument against formatting guidelines for any normal programming language as well. This is just about readability/maintainability rules.) On 10/16/15 1:34 AM, abdullah alamoudi wrote: > I believe this is about the format style of the xml files (i.e lines vs. > tabs, indentation size, max line size, etc). I don't see any harm in fixing > that and I think that is a good idea. > > Cheers, > Abdullah. > > Amoudi, Abdullah. > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: > >> With XML, I *very strongly* discourage any formatting guidelines, aka >> syntax rules. XML is about semantics. Syntax is something you'll >> sooner or later end up struggling against. >> >> Jochen >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Eldon Carman wrote: >>> I found this e-mail about formatting XML [1] in our old google group >>> mailing list. Do we want to use these formatting guidelines for our >>> project? If so, should we add this to our directions for setting up >>> eclipse. :-) >>> >>> Mahalo, >>> Preston >>> >>> [1] >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/asterixdb-dev/GtaQ4W7fYGQ/uskBBFN3vYoJ >> >> >> >> -- >> The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" >> >> >> http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg >> --------------030502070807040205000006--