asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Hillery <chill...@hillery.land>
Subject Re: start-with or starts-with?
Date Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:25:48 GMT
IMHO, yes - "start-with" doesn't actually make much sense.

At a quick glance, there are a number of test cases for start-with that are
not replicated for starts-with, so those would need to be updated as
well... likely the same for end-with.

Ceej
aka Chris Hillery

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jianfeng Jia <jianfeng.jia@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> While updating all the var-length design for string functions, I found
> there are two functions named “start-with” and “starts-with” which are
> implemented in the same way. The online document seems using “starts-with”
> http://asterixdb.ics.uci.edu/documentation/aql/functions.html#StringFunctions
> <
> http://asterixdb.ics.uci.edu/documentation/aql/functions.html#StringFunctions
> >.
>
> Should I just remove the “start-with” ? The same problem applies for
> “end-with” VS “ends-with” as well.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Jianfeng Jia
> PhD Candidate of Computer Science
> University of California, Irvine
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message